Answer:
see below the con and pros
Explanation:
pros
in the modern-day city of Istanbul which was Constantinople, now its Istanbul, not Constantinople. Which provided the inspiration for a song made famous by They Might Be Giants.
cons
the fall of Byzantine empire, the question of what life would be like, if it hadn’t, will never be answered. Sure, there might be some alternate reality where the Byzantines are alive and well. Aspects of string theory certainly suggest so. But who knows what the modern political landscape might look like with the formal existence of the Byzantine?
pros
The fall of the Byzantine empire is part of the history of the world, as we know it. We might wear hats on our feet for all we know. What might the world look like if the empire had not fallen?
cons
Fall of the Byzantine empire led to an abundance of knowledge that is lost forever, think about that forever. The loss of “Greek Fire” is definitely a drag. Greek Fire was an incendiary weapon used by the Byzantine navy, and could burn on water. No one knows just what went into that technological advantage possessed by the Byzantines.
Native American populations were decimated by diseases that had been brought by the Europeans.
Explanation:
When the Europeans discovered and settled in the New World, lot of changes occurred on both sides of the Atlantic. Many things were positive, especially when it came to exchange of goods, plants, and animals. Unfortunately, there were some negatives in it, with the spreading of diseases being among the most influential. The exchange between the two sides is known as the Columbian exchange.
The Europeans and the Native Americans had some diseases that were unique about them, and their immune systems were adapted to them, but they didn't had response for the diseases of the opposite side. Both sides suffered from this, but the effect was much greater among the Native Americans, as the majority of their populations died out because of the spreading of European diseases among them, such as the common cold and the smallpox.
Other negatives that occurred were:
- numerous wars
- systematic assimilation and genocide
- overtaking of territory
Learn more about the Columbian exchange brainly.com/question/2599432
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
The Homestead Act was a law of the United States of America created by President Abraham Lincoln on May 20, 1862. Large contingents of immigrants from Europe participated in the occupation of the vast west of the United States and without them this achievement would not lead to cape. To attract immigrants, the US government UU decreed in 1862, the Homestead Act, which defines the ownership of a property of 65 hectares to those who cultivate it for five years. Anyone who had never taken up arms against the US government. The US, including freed slaves, could file a claim for a federal land grant. This law greatly increased the flow of European immigrants to the United States. The conquest of the West, which began with the purchase of Louisiana and ended with the purchase of southern Arizona in 1853, coincided with the US industrialization period.
Although this law was very beneficial for the USA, they also produced many problems between the Native Americans and the new settlers, this problem was solved later with the relocation of the natives in different reserves.
Jailed. They were not well liked so they weren't praised.
Answer: There is really no reason to be worried this isn't a good thing but it is also not a bad thing either because basically the earths atmosphere is changing and the titonic plates are moving so the earths crust will recreate new states and make more islands like Hawaii.
