Answer: His childhood provided many topics which London could give first hand accounts on. He could write accurately about growing up without 'T.L.C. ', growing up in poverty and loneliness in childhood.
I believe that the best answer to this will be (IRONY).
By definition, irony is a state of affairs or event that seems deliberately contrary to what one expects and is often amusing. Here, its ironic that on the same day that Sekhar decides to be brutally honest, his boss asks him to critique his music.
My best bet would be d: determine the point of view
Answer: This paragraph fits into the larger structure of Thoreau’s essay since it is the introduction paragraph and provides his claims as well as what he believes in his arguments to support the overall essay. The effectiveness of how clear, convincing, and engaging the introduction is is very effective since Thoreau is listing logical reasons, claims, and his arguments in order to let the reader know what to expect as well as what he will demonstrate in the essay. In the introduction paragraph, Thoreau states that “Government is at best but an expedient; but most governments are usually, and all against a standing army, and they are many and weighty, and deserve to prevail, may also at last be brought against a standing government…”. Here he states his opening evidence to support his claims and argument.
Hope this helped! Please mark as brainliest!
Answer:
C. The fictional excerpt shows the regulations through a written notice.The nonfictional excerpt describes the reaction to the regulations.
Explanation:
This is the main way in which both the regulations differ. In these two texts, we learn about the reaction that people have had to a quarantine. In the first case, we learn about the regulations that are in place through a written notice that outlines them. On the other hand, the second excerpt, while also describing the regulations, focuses on the reaction that people had to them.
