Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
Answer:
community builders, community organizers, and community researchers.
Answer:
Antebellum New Orleans was to the interstate slave trade what H2O is to life: the key to it all. “More enslaved people from the Upper South moved through the city's slave pens en route to the region's cane and cotton fields than were brought to the entirety of North America during the Atlantic slave trade.”
Answer:Pakistan is about twice the size of California in terms of land area, ... ... A length of about 1,800 miles makes the Indus one of the longest rivers in the world, and ... Indus River has nourished the development of agricultural societies since ancient times. ... Unlike many deserts, the Gobi doesn't have sand dunes but is instead .
Explanation:
