Answer:
$1140.28
Explanation:
The computation of the net present value of this investment is shown below:-
= Annual Cash flows × Present Value of Annuity Factor (r , n) - Initial Investment
as
Annual cash flows = $8600
Present Value of Annuity Factor (r , n)
r = 10% and n = 4 years
So, the Present Value of Annuity Factor will be the sum of the present value of 4 years at 10%
For Year 1 = 0.9091
For Year 2 = 0.8264
For Year 3 = 0.7513
For Year 4 = 0.6830
Total = 3.1698
Therefore,
Net Present Value = (Cash inflow × Total) -
Initial Investment
= ($8600 × 3.1698) - $26,120
= $27,260.28 - $26,120
= $1140.28
Answer:
Loss on Sale of Equipment = $10,000.
Explanation:
The gain or loss on sale of Property, plant, and Equipment is calculated by comparing Carrying Value (Cost - Accumulated Depreciation) and Sale Proceeds. The carrying value of a machine at the end of 4th year is:
CV = 78,000 - { [ (78,000 - 3,000) / 5 ] * 4} = 78,000 - 60,000 = $18,000.
<u>Calculating Gain/Loss:</u>
Gain / (Loss) = Carrying value - Sales Proceeds = 18,000 - 8,000 = ($10,000).
Because the company has sold a machine worth of $18,000 for $8,000, so it has incurred a loss of $10,000 on the transaction. This loss is recognized in the Statement of Profit or Loss.
For taxpayers with household income below 400% of the FPL there is a table of repayment limitation.
For at least 300% but not less than 400% ( for example: 350% ) it is $1,250.
Answer: $1,250.
Answer:
The answer is "Option c".
Explanation:
The customer service must matter arising' needs to fulfill everyone. The Sampson Company, a timber manufacturer, understands the wood specifications or conditions for several firms within the NAICS category. Within this case, the Dunn Company will develop the timber specifications or criteria of all firms underclass.
Answer:
Risk and Return
1. Joe is an average investor. His financial advisor gave him options of investing in stock A, with a σ of 12%, and stock B, with a σ of 9%. Both stocks have the same expected return of 16%. Joe can pick only one stock and decides to invest in stock B.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
2. Marcie works for an educational technology firm that recently launched its employee stock option plan (ESOP). Marcie allocated all her investments in the ESOP.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
3. rin wants to invest in a hedge fund that has had a very strong performance track record. The hedge fund has given its investors a return of over 60% for the past five years. Although Erin is tempted to put her money in the fund, she decides to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund’s assets, because she is aware that past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
Explanation:
1. Joe's decision to invest in stock B is a good financial decision. Since both investments have the same returns, the decision on which investment to take shifts to the standard deviation of the returns, which specifies the variability of the returns. Invariably, the investment with less standard deviation should win the vote. Therefore, Joe's decision is a good financial decision because investment in B has a standard deviation of 9% unlike A's 12%.
2. Putting all eggs in one market as Marcie had done by allocating all her investments in the ESOP is not a good financial decision, theoretically. It is always best to spread the risks, though higher-yielding investments (returns) bear higher risks.
3. The decision of Erin to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund's assets, despite its past performance is a good financial decision. Due diligence reveals some behind-the-scene information that are instrumental in making sound business decisions. Who are the present managers of the fund? What systems are in place in the entity to guarantee similar future performance, all things being equal? What market's sentiments and information are available for consideration? These questions, and many others can be answered through a due diligence. Surely, "past performance is no guarantee of future results."