1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Luda [366]
3 years ago
5

A hardware buyer plans to purchase 75 ladders which will retail for $35 each. He has already placed an order for 48 ladders at $

16.50 each. What is the most he can pay for each of the remaining ladders if he is to obtain a 48% markup goal?
Business
1 answer:
Anarel [89]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

<em>The most he can pay for each of the remaining ladders if he is to obtain a 48% markup goal is </em><em>$36.357</em><em>.</em>

Explanation:

  • <em>A hardware buyer plans to purchase 75 ladders which will retail for $35 each. </em>This means that he is going to sell each ladder for $35, regardless of how much he paid for them before.
  • <em>He has already placed an order for 48 ladders at $16.50 each</em>. So out of the 75 ladders he is planning to purchase and then sell, he bought 48 at a reduced price of only $16.50 each. Now if we subtract those numbers, as shown below, we determine that he still needs to buy 27 more ladders at an unknown price:

<em>(75 - 48) ladders = 27 ladders</em>

  • <em>What is the most he can pay for each of the remaining ladders if he is to obtain a 48% markup goal? </em>So we need to determine the maximum price for each of the remaining 27 ladders if he is to obtain a 48% markup goal.

<em>Markup </em><em>in this case is just a measure of the ratio (in %) between the profit made </em>(by selling 75 ladders for $35 each)<em> to the cost paid </em>(by buying 48 of them at $16.5 each and 27 of them at an unknown price). Its formula is as follows:

Markup=\frac{Profit}{Cost}*100

Now, we already have our markup goal of 48%, so we can substitute that number into the formula, and divide both sides of the equation by 100:

48=\frac{Profit}{Cost}*100\\0.48=\frac{Profit}{Cost}\\\frac{Profit}{Cost}=0.48

We know that Cost is the sum of what he paid for the 48 ladders, <em>plus </em>what he is to pay for the remaining 27 ladders, so it should look something like this:

Cost=(48ladders*16.5\frac{dollars}{ladder} )+(27ladders*x)

Cost=(792 dollars)+(27ladders*x)

Where '<em>x</em>' is the maximum price he can pay for each of the remaining 27 ladders if he is to obtain a 48% markup goal.

We should also know that Profit is what he gets by selling the 75 ladders, <em>minus </em>the cost paid for them. It should look something like this:

Profit=(75ladders*35\frac{dollars}{ladder} )-[(792dollars)+(27ladders*x)]

Profit=(2625dollars)-[(792dollars)+(27ladders*x)]\\Profit=(2625dollars)-(792dollars)-(27ladders*x)\\Profit=(1833dollars)-(27ladders*x)

Next, we want to substitute what we have so far for Cost and Profit into the worked Markup formula we had written before, and solve the equation by isolating our '<em>x</em>'. To do that, let's follow these steps:

\frac{Profit}{Cost}=0.48

\frac{(1833dollars)-(27ladders*x)}{(792 dollars)+(27ladders*x)}=0.48\\1833dollars-27ladders*x=0.48*[792 dollars+27ladders*x]\\1833dollars-27ladders*x=380.16dollars+12.96ladders*x

At this point, <em>we want to transfer the 'x' terms to one side of the equation, and the other terms to the other side</em>, so we get to the answer:

1833dollars-380.16dollars=12.96ladders*x+27ladders*x\\1452.84dollars=(12.96+27)ladders*x\\1452.84dollars=39.96ladders*x

Finally, we divide both sides of the equation by 39.96 ladders:

\frac{1452.84dollars}{39.96ladders} =x\\36.357\frac{dollars}{ladders}=x\\x=36.357\frac{dollars}{ladders}

So the most he can pay for each of the remaining ladders if he is to obtain a 48% markup goal is $36.357. That means that even if he buys the remaining ladders for a higher price than what he is willing to sell them for, he still obtains a 48% markup goal.

You might be interested in
An investment offers a total return of 15 percent over the coming year. Janice Yellen thinks the total real return on this inves
Ludmilka [50]

Answer:

The inflation rate of return is 3.60%

Explanation:

As we know,

Inflation rate of return = {( 1 + nominal rate of return) ÷ ( 1+ real rate of return)} - 1

= {( 1 + 15%) ÷ (1+11%)} - 1

= (1.15) ÷ (1.11)} - 1

= 1.0360 - 1

= 0.360 or 3.60%

The inflation rate of return shows a relationship between the nominal rate of return and the real rate of return. We simply divide the nominal rate of return by real rate of return

8 0
3 years ago
Which is NOT one of the similarity between projects and operations Both are Performed by Individuals Both are Limited by constra
bonufazy [111]

Answer:

Both are ongoing

Explanation:

Remember, projects do not go on forever. Rather, projects are usually marked by deadlines. However, operations are simply ongoing activities in which resources are planned, executed, monitored and controlled by individuals.

which may be constrain

A none similarity between projects and operations is that, they both are not ongoing .

5 0
3 years ago
Which of these are loans to businesses or governments?
Yanka [14]
<span>Bonds are actually a type of borrowing or loans most businesses and governments use. They represents an alternative to the common bank loans, however they enable loan of higher amounts of money, that governments need but ordinary banks are not able to provide.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Dan owns an autographed copy of a brittany spears cd that he values at $100. if he sells the cd at the garage sale he's planning
Delvig [45]

The complete question is as follows:

Dan owns an autographed copy of a Brittany Spears CD that he values at $100. If he sells the CD at the garage sale he’s planning to hold in a few weeks, it will be sold to a buyer with a reservation price of $175. If he sells it on eBay, it will be sold to a buyer with a reservation price of $500. eBay will charge Dan $50 to auction the CD, which just covers eBay’s opportunity cost of running the auction. Relative to selling the CD at his garage sale, auctioning the CD on eBay will lead:

A. to no change in total economic surplus.

B. total economic surplus to increase by $500.

C. total economic surplus to increase by $275.

D. total economic surplus to increase by $100.

Answer: C - Total economic surplus to increase by $275.

In this question, we only need to consider producers' surplus since we're considering the various options for Dan to sell his CD.

We calculate Producer's Surplus as follows:

Producer's surplus = Market Selling Price - Economic Cost.

Economic costs not only refers to explicit costs like cost of the CD, but also includes opportunity costs. Since we need to calculate producer's surplus when Dan sells on Ebay, we need to consider the following costs:

Value of the CD = $100

Ebay's opportunity cost that Dan will have to bear = $50

Profit Dan would've received in garage sale = $75 ($175 - $100)

Among the three expenses listed above, the profit Dan would've got in the garage sale is considered the <u>implicit cost or opportunity cost.</u>

Substituting the values we have in the equation above, we get,

Producer's Surplus = 500 - (100+50+75)

Producer's Surplus = 275

8 0
3 years ago
Suppose that on Valentine's Day, the demand for both roses and greeting cards increases by the same percentage amount. However,
BigorU [14]

Answer:

Based on the information supply of cards is more elastic (price sensitive) than that of roses

Explanation:

Price elasticity of supply is defined as the sensitivity of quantity supplied to changes in price.

The formula is given below

Price elasticity of supply= Change in quantity supplied ÷ Change in price

In this scenario the demand for both roses and cards increases, however the price of roses increases more.

This implies that the denominator in the formula is higher in roses resulting in smaller price elasticity of supply.

The elasticity of supply for cards is higher than that of roses, so it is more sensitive to changes in price.

Cards can be stored from year to year so the labour for maintaining a stock of cards is low with resultant low price.

On the other hand roses require care to grow. It requires watering, application of chemicals to treat infestation and so on. So suppliers tend to push the extra cost of growing roses to the buyers

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the pricing objective of a firm that adjusts price levels so it can increase sales volume to match organizational expens
    12·1 answer
  • Which strategy are you using when you only read the title, section headings, and captions? A. guessing from context B. paraphras
    8·2 answers
  • Gabriele Enterprises has bonds on the market making annual payments, with eight years to maturity, a par value of $1,000, and se
    8·1 answer
  • Sterling Morrow, a fashion brand known for casual dresses, is launching a new product line: Carry Tu, a line of women’s fashion
    15·1 answer
  • Larry is asked to conduct an STP analysis for his firm. The first step he should perform in this analysis is to: A. develop a bu
    11·1 answer
  • Expenses that are not easily associated with a specific department, and which are incurred for the joint benefit of more than on
    5·1 answer
  • The "too big to fail" policy of the Fed, whereby some banks are bailed out if they are in danger of failing because they are too
    8·1 answer
  • Grace Owen formed a corporation with three of her friends for purposes of operating a catering company. Grace used her own check
    5·1 answer
  • According to Adam Smith, a country has an absolute advantage in the production of a product when it _____.
    5·1 answer
  • References that employers trust for the most accurate reporting include _____. a. friends b. relatives c. counselors d. parents
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!