The balance between corruption and positive accomplishment by the Reconstruction-era state governments in the South is shown below:
For the positive side: there were public education system and work programs. While 20 black people served in the US HOR between 1869 and 1901.
For the corruption side: there were race segregation in school, and Freedmen’s Bureau took back the lands from the blacks and gave it to the whites. No black man was elected governor in the Southern states between 1869 and 1901.
Answer:
bad
Explanation:
he was responsible for the dawes act which had a negative effect on American Indians, as it ended their communal holding of property, by which they had ensured that everyone had a home and a place in the tribe. Land owned by Indians decreased from 138 million acres in 1887 to 48 million acres in 1934.
The treaty gave most of the Western Hemisphere to Spain. The pope was no longer the supreme religious and political authority in Europe. European nations stopped looking for new western routes to India.
Not completely sure what your curriculum has taught you specifically, but just using common sense you could probably assume that the KKK did not aim to do anything beneficial to society.
Therefore, the answer must be D, unless there was something else that was taught to you explicitly that may go against this logic.
