Answer:
Explanation:
Below are some of the financial ratios he should consider:
a) Financial leverage ratios: This is used to measure the company earnings to service debt payments.
b) Return on investment: This is the ratio that is used to evaluate the profitability of the firm and the profit that is available to the stakeholders after all payments have been made.
c) Price to Earnings Ratio: This is an indicator of the price of the company's stock concerning the earnings per share. It is used to analyze if the stock price is over-priced or under-priced.
Answer:
The answer is III) make simultaneous trades in two markets without any net investment.
Explanation:
Arbitrage is simultaneously buying an asset ( may be currency, securities...) in a low-priced market and sell it in a high-priced market.
As a results, the investor earns profit from price differences in the two markets without risk and net investment. It is because the two trading happens at the same time once price differences in any two markets are recognized ( arbitrage opportunities recognized) and the proceed of selling the asset is immediately used for financing/returning to the buying of the asset.
Thus, (III) is the correct answer.
Answer:
c. $24,850
Explanation:
A non-governmental, not-for-profit organization held the following investments: Investment Cost Fair value (beginning of the year) Fair value (end of the year) Stock A (100 shares) $50 per share $45 $51 Stock B (200 shares) $40 per share $41 $49
; Bonds Cost $9,000 Fair value (beginning of the year) Fair value (end of the year)$10,000 $9,950
The amount that should be the total value of investments reported in the year-end statement of financial position? will be the fair value of the investments at the end of the year becaue investments by financial reporting standards are carried at fair values unlike physical assets carried at costs
Stock A = 100 Shares x fair value end of year of $51 = 5,100
Stock B = 200 Shares x fair value end of year of $49 = 9,800
Bond @ Fair value end of year...........................................= 9,950
Total............................................................................................$24,850
Answer:
Legal obligation will arise from inadvertence of one thing or a deliberate act. There are 3 categories of erroneous conduct lawfully. Its fissure of agreement, corruption and one who is pretentious or abraded thanks to the act of additional person.
(1)
The necessities that the automobile should demonstrate to carry mister. Embarrassed of carelessness are as per RES IPSA LOQUITUR belief. The belief RES IPSA LOQUITUR suggests that "the factor expresses for himself". In keeping with this opinion, the broken or damage himself is that the resistant and it expresses for the performance of the inattention. This belief needs the subsequent things:
- The affair or act ought to happen thanks to the carelessness
- the carelessness ought to cause some injury or damage
- the litigant ought to have fashionable management over the device or instrumentality.
- The casualty shouldn't have underwrote something to the carelessness.
(2)
Permitting to the law of carelessness, underneath request of householders and operatives of vehicles, P. Suppliers are control lawfully chargeable for the grievance to the automobile. In keeping with this, the vendor of vehicle United Nations agency energies sloppily and origins grievance is liable for the obligation produced to the broken individual. The proprietor will have the instruction of last vibrant probability. Enclose if the worker of the car isn't the proprietor then the possessor is not liable for the act of the carelessness of the worker delivered if there's associate deficiency of agency association. During this case, agency association exists. Thus, P Distributors are control chargeable for the injury to the celebration.
(b)
The possessor of vehicle United Nations agency drives inaccurately and causes grievance is liable for the liability produced to the broken individual. The possessor will have the instruction of last vibrant probability. In case, if the worker of the car isn't the possessor then the proprietor is not liable for the performance of the carelessness of the worker delivered if there's associate deficiency of agency association. During this case each belief of RES IPSA LOQUITUR and regulation of carelessness are pertinent. Thus, the Mr. Tom is control chargeable for the performance of his partner.
