Answer:
$492
Explanation:
The computation of the total salary for the month is shown below:
= Base salary of a sales women + commission amount
where,
Base salary of a sales women = $420
And, the commission amount is
= ($8,200 - $7,000) × 6%
= $72
So, the total salary for the month is
= $420 + $72
= $492
Basically we added the base salary and the commission amount for computing the total salary
Answer:
RecRoom Equipment Company
Date Particulars Debit Credit
1Nov Note Receivable $ 13,200
Account Receivable $ 13,200
RecRoom Equipment Company received an $13,200, six-month, 7 percent note to settle an $13,200 unpaid balance owed by a customer.
31 December Interest Receivable $ 924
Interest Revenue $ 924
To record the accrued interest earned. $13,200*7%= $ 924. As it is for two months the amount would be $ (924/12)*2= $ 154
1 May Cash $ 13,662
Interest Income $ 462
Notes Receivable $ 13,200
RecRoom receives the interest on the note's maturity date. RecRoom receives the principal on the note's maturity date.
Answer:
a) 15 to 35 approximately 95%
(b) 10 to 40 approximately almost all
(c) 20 to 30 approximately 68%
Explanation:
The data have a bell-shaped distribution which means the data is equally distributed on both sides of the mean.
We have the mean at 25 and a standard deviation of 5 which means that the interval is for each of the values of 5 .
The mean would be u and
The first value would be u ±σ = 25 ± 5= 20 and 30 (68 % )
The second value will be u ± 2σ= 25± 10 = 15 and 35 (95%)
The third value will be u ± 3σ= 25 ± 15 = 10 and 40 (99.7 % almost all)
In the figure below the light blue region gives u ±σ on both sides of the mean
, dark blue gives u ± 2σ values on both sides of the mean and grey gives
u ± 3 σ values on both sides of the mean.
It is obvious that 68 % of the data is contained in the u ±σ light blue region, 95 % of the data in the u ± 2σ dark blue including light blue and 99.7 % in the u ± 3σ all colored regions.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Base on the scenario been described in the question which, Darren was eligible to assist to a traditional of 401,000 in 2019, but we were told he forgot and later he paid in 15, June 2020, he is look as though he paid in 2019 because and it is true.
The reason why the answer is true is that Darren is that the time he paid the money in July 15, 2020, it was still within the time he allowed to still pay for the year 2019, that's why he considered as though he paid in 2019.
This can indicate fraud, duress, or undue influence.
In contracts, "consideration" is the things of value each side gives up in an exchange. So if one side gives $1 for a cup of coffee, that might be ok. Now, consider if the contract was to sell your entire house for $1! That would be a shockingly inadequate exchange because even the cheapest home is worth way more than $1.
In that case, the judge might look at <em><u>why</u></em> someone would be willing to give up so much for so little. Were they falsely told there home was worth nothing or maybe told that they would get $1 upfront and more later? That would be <u>fraud</u>. Were they told to sign the contract with a gun pointed at their head? That is an example of <u>duress</u>. Finally, did the person helping them with the contract have undue influence? If your boss, parent, or favorite celebrity advises you to do something that you don't want to do, but you worry about what they will thing if you don't, then you were a victim of their <u>undue influence. </u>
