In preparing for their class debate on the topic of the Supreme Court ruling on violent video games v. First Amendment rights, J
amal wrote the following introduction for his team’s opening remarks. Read it and answer the question. (1)Both the motion picture and video game industries attempt to limit access to violent content by use of rating systems. (2)However, the ratings do not protect a user under the age of 18 from viewing violent content. (3)So what is a parent to do when attempting to protect their young children from exposure to content that depicts violence? (4)Citing facts and using logic, I will attempt to counter the reasoning behind the Supreme Court’s recent ruling favoring free speech rights of children under the age of 18 over the rights of parents to restrict violent material from this same age group.
Which revision to this introduction would MOST appropriately enhance the intent of Jamal’s message?
Click here to read “Free Speech Versus Kids and Violent Video Games.”
Click here to read “Supreme Court Ruling—Violent Video Games.”
Remove the words, “Citing facts and using logic” at the beginning of sentence 4 because they are an assumption of all debates and therefore unnecessary to include.
To create a better transition of ideas, insert the following after sentence 3: “It appears that relying on the accuracy of video rating systems is the only option available as the Supreme Court has given the video gaming industry another win with their recent ruling favoring free speech rights of children.”
To strengthen the assertion, replace, “However,” with the following words at the beginning of sentence 2: “As we all know,”
In the first sentence, stress or place emphasis on the word, “attempt” to allow the audience to understand the irony of this statement.
Answer: My best guess is 3. Video-Games have been scientificly researched to not cause any viloence actions in the real world. I don't understand why we're spending so much money on research which is horribly wrong. Anyway video games are sort of safe for most people.
The most logical reason as to why sleep teaching failed is because they didn't consider the strength of a child's mind. They wanted to show the kids sane reality, which was really overpowering and incomprehensible. In fact, they even changed strategies years after the fact, moral instruction turned into the favored lesson. This was accepted to be suitable on the grounds that it was not rational idea.
An analogy is a cognitive process of transferring information or meaning from a particular subject to another, or a linguistic expression corresponding to such a process.“Life is like a box of chocolates—you never know what you're gonna get." That is an analogy
There are 3 types of clause. Relative clause, noun clause and adverbial clause. It helps provide support to the verb and this is often found with verb in a sentence. It is a combination of word which contains subject and verb.
