Answer:
No, Watching TV has an opportunity cost
Explanation:
Opportunity costs represent the forfeited benefits for preferring a certain option over others. It is the foregone benefits from the next best alternative.
Watching TV for two hours has an opportunity cost. By watching TV, a person has sacrificed doing other things. The two hours could have been used in other ways like working, studying, swimming, or playing. By watching TV, the person missed benefits from the other activities. The other activity that would have resulted in more benefits other than watching TV is the opportunity cost.
In the context of the supply chain process, plan consists of the processes needed to operate an existing supply chain strategically.
<h3>What is
supply chain process?</h3>
A supply chain serves as the step that is required in getting a finished product or service to the final customer.
It should be noted that this encompasses the sourcing raw materials, moving them to production, hence In the context of the supply chain process, plan consists of the processes needed to operate an existing supply chain strategically.
Learn more on supply chain process at:
brainly.com/question/17199371
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answer to this question is Upward.
Explanation:
CSIRT is at lower level then the organizational and IT/infoSec management in the hierarchical structure.
So if the CSIRT sends some information to organizational and IT/infoSec the flow should be considered as upward flow.
Hence we that the answer to this question is upward.
Answer:
a. 8.33 percent
Explanation:
The computation of the economy's growth rate between the two years is presented below:
= (GDP at the end of year 2 - GDP at the end of year 1) ÷ (GDP at the end of year 1) × 100
= ($1,300 billion - $1,200 billion) ÷ ($1,200 billion) × 100
= ($100 billion) ÷ ($1,200 billion) × 100
= 8.33%
The economic growth rate is always expressed in percentage form
Answer: COGNITIVE DISSONANCE
Explanation: Cognitive dissonance refers to a mental state in which a person holds two or more values or beliefs that are contradicting with each other. Such individuals changes their values according to the situation.
In the given case, Anna Jonas strongly believes that rights of workers should be supported but when her firm got into distress she herself violated them.
Hence from the above we can conclude that she is most likely be experiencing cognitive dissonance.
