The correct answer is B because even with her injury she still felt sure she could ride without danger
Yes, you could use it as a hook. I don’t know about background information and definitely not the thesis.
Answer:
Conjunction Fallacy
Explanation:
The Conjunction Fallacy is a formal fallacy when one uses evidence that a combination-- or conjunction-- of two possible events are more likely than one of the other events. The speaker only uses two events: "...that the Yankes lose the first game of the series, or that they lose the first game and come back to win?" <em>and </em>combines the two in the latter pondering.
The Base Rate Fallacy is a paradox that explains situations where there is more than one false factoid of evidence. The speaker doesn't address false evidence and decide upon it, so this can't be the answer.
The fallacy (law) of small numbers is an informal fallacy when one reaches a decision based on insufficient evidence. While it's true that the speaker doesn't have enough evidence, they also don't have any-- thence the answer is the Conjunction Fallacy.
The Regression to the Mean fallacy is an informal fallacy when one explains something by its probabilistic nature-- not based on evidence. The speaker explains that they simply "...expect the Yankees to win the series, so [they'll] take the second choice."
The way the structure of the excerpt adds meaning to the passage is that C. It introduces several of the narrators who will share their points of view.
<h3>What is a Narration?</h3>
This refers to telling a story by a narrator where the background information of a text and the surrounding action is told to an audience.
Hence, we can see that from the complete text, there is the use of several narrators to show their different parts of view and this helps to add meaning to the passage.
Read more about narrators here:
brainly.com/question/21145221
#SPj4
