Answer:
<u>a. Zero dividend.</u>
<u>b. 3.5 new shares</u>;
<em>texes will be paid.</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
a. March 20 is a date earlier than when the dividends are too be paid on April 18, and as such Wilfred Nadeau<em> will not</em> receive any dividend if he sells his stocks since he no longer has ownership of them.
b. 45 cents dividends per 300 stocks of Wilfred is $135 (reinvestment dividend plan).
With a discount of 3.4% at $39.8 (3.4%*39.8) current price per stock makes the total cost per stock after discount= $38.4.
Dividing the reinvestment dividend plan over the discounted price (135/38.4) = 3.5 new shares, According to the requirements of law the investor must still pay tax annually on his or her dividend income, whether it is received as cash or reinvested.
Answer:
growth funds
Explanation:
If you have done enough research in a particular company to invest in them then growth funds do generate a lot of profit however they are a bit risky.
They allege that officials have deprived inmates of their constitutional rights
Answer:
Multiple choices below are missing:
A) purchase Bond A
B) purchase Bond B
C) purchase neither A nor B at this time
D) negotiate a higher rate on Bond A
The correct option is A,purchase bond A.
Explanation:
By purchasing Bond A,Lee is assured interest payment of 7.5% for a period of twenty years,hence the issuer cannot call the bond if interest rate drops by 2% in order to issue a lower interest-bearing bond which would be cheaper cost-wise.
However, if Lee purchases Bond B with current coupon of 8.25%,the interest is only guaranteed for a period of two years,since the issuer has the prerogative of calling back the bond after two years should interest fall in order to issue another bond that commands lower interest rate.
<u>Explanation:</u>
First, remember that the difference between <em>normative and positive economic analysis</em> is that;
Normative analysis take a somewhat neutral view by stating how the world should be. While
The Positive analysis states the facts. That is, it describes the world as it is.
<u>
Thus, a </u><u>Normative analysis</u><u> of the consequence of minimum wage would be the following statements:</u>
c. In some cities such as San Francisco and New York, it would be impossible for low−skilled workers to live comfortably in the city without minimum wage laws.
d. The gains to winners of a minimum wage law should be valued more highly than the losses to losers because the latter primarily comprises businesses.
<u>And a </u><u>Positive analysis</u><u> of the consequence of minimum wage would be the following statements:</u>
a. The minimum wage law causes unemployment.
b. A minimum wage law benefits some groups and hurts others.