Answer:
The Monroe doctrine stated that the U.S. should use military force to prevent any form of intervention from an European power in the western hemisphere.
The Roosevelt corollary was different in that it allowed European powers to intervene as long as the intervention was considered justified, but not to invade.
This difference became clear during the Venezuelan crisis of 1902-1903, when Germany, Britain, and Italy imposed a naval blockade on Venezuela because the Venezuela president refused to pay for the damages suffered by European citizens during the recent civil war.
At first, Theodore Roosevelt allowed the blockade to continue because he believed that it was justified, but when Germany threatened to invade Venezuela, he intervened sending a fleet under Admiral George Dewey.
The Equal Protection clause is the last part of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the USA. The full amendment reads:
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
All these rulings have actually had the effect of reinforcing the legal protections of very different minority groups (Hispanics, women, LGBTs). The SCOTUS has ruled that these protections apply both a the federal and the state level since according to the Constitution all states must ensure equal protection of the laws for all citizens born or naturalized in the United States. The court clearly considers these issues as relevant to everyday citizens.
Therefore, the correct answer is D. It has interpreted equal protection as applying to different groups of people.
Answer:
<em>1.</em><em> </em><em>Because</em><em> </em><em>he</em><em> </em><em>wants</em><em> </em><em>his</em><em> </em><em>opinion</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>be</em><em> </em><em>heard</em><em> </em><em>not</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>mention</em><em> </em><em>with</em><em> </em><em>Mr</em><em> </em><em>Con.</em><em> </em><em>Mr</em><em> </em><em>Con</em><em> </em><em>want</em><em> </em><em>things</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>go</em><em> </em><em>accordingly</em><em>.</em><em> </em>
<em>2.</em><em> </em><em>Because</em><em> </em><em>he</em><em> </em><em>feels</em><em> </em><em>that</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>Roosevelt</em><em> </em><em>does not</em><em> </em><em>make</em><em> </em><em>good</em><em> </em><em>decisions</em><em> </em><em>nowadays</em><em> </em><em>they</em><em> </em><em>intend</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>make</em><em> </em><em>people</em><em> </em><em>angrier</em><em> </em><em>every time</em><em> </em><em>because</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>decision</em><em> </em><em>they</em><em> </em><em>take</em><em>.</em><em> </em>
Answer:
California is much better within the United States than it would be in an independent country. Even if California has a great economy, it's not just about the economy to start a new country. Also, even if they wanted to, America wouldn't approve of it, in the end, California is an influential and important state to them.
Explanation:
Hope this helps 3>
