The ground rules mainly focused on land acquirement during the imperialization.
1. <span>The european nations agreed on ruling the colonizations of africa
</span>
2. If the land <span>was truly does</span> not belong to any party during that time, one party could simply claim that land without any challenge.
3. If on some circumtances, the land is claimed by other party, the dispute shall be settled through concession under treaty.
Answer:
The war resulted in the Treaty of Tientsin (26 June 1858), which forced the Chinese to pay reparations for the expenses of the recent war, open a second group of ten ports to European commerce, legalize the opium trade, and grant foreign traders and missionaries rights to travel within China.
Explanation:
I'm smart
Is there answer choices to this?
The plantation system developed for several reasons. The Southern colonies had been founded by companies or proprietors who wished to make a profit, and they accordingly encouraged cash crops like tobacco (in the Chesapeake) and rice (in the Low Country). These crops were labor intensive, which meant that growers turned first to indentured servants and then to African slaves as a labor supply (so, too, did sugar planters in the Caribbean.) They also required a great deal of land and capital, which meant that due to an economic principle called "economies of scale," cash crops, especially rice, favored very wealthy people with large landholdings and access to large labor forces. So in the Southern colonies/United States, the economic realities of staple crop production favored the formation of large farms, or plantations. Cotton, which emerged as the biggest cash crop in the nineteenth-century South, was less shaped by economies of scale--many small planters and farmers could profitably raise the crop. But even still, the largest cotton planters in places like Alabama and Mississippi dominated the Southern economy and increasingly its politics. Large capital investments in land and enslaved people made the production of large amounts of cotton profitable, so the region's dependence on cash crops continued to foster the plantation system.
Answer:
Greek slaves were owned by individuals, while helots were owned by the state.
Explanation:
Slavery was common among Athenians as they used thousands of slaves to work in their private homes, factories and mines. Slaves captured in war and came from all over the Mediterranean. Slaves were the property of their master. A slave owner could sell, rent, give or leave them. A slave could have a family but not acknowledged by the state, and the master could divide the family members at per his wishes.
Helots were state-owned slaves. There were very much in practice in the ancient Spartans. They were specified to work in a piece of land. They also forced to work in fields as they were serf.
