I'm assuming you're trying to find out how much you'll spend annually on gas: first you would divide the total miles driven in a year (13,000) by your car's mpg (26) giving you a quotient of 500 (the amount of times you'll have to fill up your tank) from here you will need to multiply 500 times the cost of gas ($3.60) giving you a product of $1,800 spent on gas annually.
The hypothesis shows that we have evidence that the proportion surviving after eating organic is higher.
<h3>How to illustrate the information?</h3>
The following can be deduced from the information:
x1 = 275
x2 = 170
n1 = 500
n2 = 500
The sample proportion will be:
p1 = 275/500 = 0.55
p2 = 170/500 = 0.34
The pooled proportion will be:
= (275 + 170)/(500 + 500)
= 0.44
The test statistic is 6.681. It should be noted that the test statistics is a number that's calculated by a statistical test. It shows how the observed data are far from the null hypothesis.
The p value in this scenario is extremely small. The p value is a measurement used to validate a hypothesis against the observed data. Therefore, we have to reject the null hypothesis.
In this case, the hypothesis shows that we have evidence that the proportion surviving after eating organic is higher.
Learn more about hypothesis on:
brainly.com/question/15980493
#SPJ1
Idk sorry I would answer if I did but I need points to ask a question
Given:
Let P= profit
let n= no. of tacos sold per day
Sol'n:
P= 3.25n-210
the profit needs to be positive, thus
3.25n>210
n>210/3.25
n> 64.615
they can only sell whole tacos, therefore they must sell at least 65 tacos to make a profit and that profit is:
P=3.25n-210
P=3.25*65 - 210
P= 211.25 -210
P= 1.25
$1.25 profit
