Answer:
This question is incomplete. Here are the missing options:
- a) self-concept
- <u>b) self-efficacy</u>
- c) reciprocity
- d) introjection
The answer is b) self-efficacy.
Explanation:
Self-efficacy is defined as the belief of a person about their ability to successfully perform a task. The degree of self-efficacy influences our attitude towards a specific goal and increases the possibilities of achieving it.
The theories of self-efficacy have been used to treat several behaviours, such as consistent exercise and drug cessation.
Answer: physical therapist.
Explanation: these are professionals that helps those sick, injured or disabled to be able to manage their condition to help achieve greater benefits in their health and life as a whole. This they do in form of coaching, exercise e. T. C. They help improve the quality of life of the individual and help prevent future problem that could result from the ailment being left unattended to.
Answer:
All of them
Explanation:
The king condemning his own peaceful actions to be the cause of violence is in complete contradiction to one another. An oddity occurs and the action is in complete contrast to the outcome. One cannot justify that the corresponding actions may have led to the specific outcome. such is also the case in the example:
a; condemning a robbed man for having too much money does in no way justifies the action of robbing. Blaming a source that was done only for the reason of ones own satisfaction.
b; condemning Socrates for his truth to force people to make him drink the hemlock, is as absurd as the above example.
c; condemning Jesus for his devotion to God shows that the intention of the action was completely different but the outcome was in complete contrast.
Answer:
Equilibrium = when supply is equal to demand.
Explanation:
Answer:
I am not completely sure, but I would go with A
