Advantage---Loose constructionists tend to uphold civil rights and liberties. Judicially active, loose constructionist judges such as Ruth Bader Ginsburg tend to dissent in cases which infringe civil liberties such as Salinas v Texas (2013) and agree with rulings that don't e.g. 2015 Same sex rulingAdvantage---Loose constructionists often protect minorities, especially those incompatible with Congress or the executive. This is because loose constructionists are not scared to overturn laws or actions made by Congress or the executive e.g. Brown v Board of EducationDisadvantage---Loose constructionists tend to be judicially active, which has fuelled arguments on the politicisation of the Court. They 'legislate from the bench' by striking down laws as unconstitutional. This is undemocratic and elitist, as they have mandate from the electorateDisadvantage---Loose constructionists tend to be too sensitive to public opinion, which could hamper the neutrality and independence of the Court. However, some public support is necessary to maintain the authority of the Court.
Answer:
so in my understanding we select 4?
this is the answer for when i select 4
1.) it led to the development of new forms of irrigation
2.) shrinking farms were unable to support large cities
3.) it reduced the amount of farmable land.
4.) It benefited farmers by eliminating monsoon flooding.
the wrong answer is it caused people to change the types of crops they planted
Explanation:
Answer:
abc youngboy what it doooo
Explanation:
yurrrr
Explanation:
<em>So</em><em>cial Darwinism</em> is the theory that human groups and races are subject to the same laws of natural selection as Charles Darwin perceived in plants and animals in nature.
Hope it's helpful
