1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Blizzard [7]
3 years ago
10

What was the main flaw in the sepreme courts reasoning in Plessy v. Ferguson

English
1 answer:
devlian [24]3 years ago
8 0
N Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of a Louisiana law passed in 1890 "providing for separate railway carriages for the white and colored races." The law, which required that all passenger railways provide separate cars for blacks and whites, stipulated that the cars be equal in facilities, banned whites from sitting in black cars and blacks in white cars (with exception to "nurses attending children of the other race"), and penalized passengers or railway employees for violating its terms. 

<span>Homer Plessy, the plaintiff in the case, was seven-eighths white and one-eighth black, and had the appearance of a white man. On June 7, 1892, he purchased a first-class ticket for a trip between New Orleans and Covington, La., and took possession of a vacant seat in a white-only car. Duly arrested and imprisoned, Plessy was brought to trial in a New Orleans court and convicted of violating the 1890 law. He then filed a petition against the judge in that trial, Hon. John H. Ferguson, at the Louisiana Supreme Court, arguing that the segregation law violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which forbids states from denying "to any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws," as well as the Thirteenth Amendment, which banned slavery. </span>

<span>The Court ruled that, while the object of the Fourteenth Amendment was to create "absolute equality of the two races before the law," such equality extended only so far as political and civil rights (e.g., voting and serving on juries), not "social rights" (e.g., sitting in a railway car one chooses). As Justice Henry Brown's opinion put it, "if one race be inferior to the other socially, the constitution of the United States cannot put them upon the same plane." Furthermore, the Court held that the Thirteenth Amendment applied only to the imposition of slavery itself. </span>

<span>The Court expressly rejected Plessy's arguments that the law stigmatized blacks "with a badge of inferiority," pointing out that both blacks and whites were given equal facilities under the law and were equally punished for violating the law. "We consider the underlying fallacy of [Plessy's] argument" contended the Court, "to consist in the assumption that the enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority. If this be so, it is not by reason of anything found in the act, but solely because the colored race chooses to put that construction upon it." </span>

<span>Justice John Marshall Harlan entered a powerful -- and lone -- dissent, noting that "in view of the Constitution, in the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens. There is no caste here. Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens." </span>

<span>Until the mid-twentieth century, Plessy v. Ferguson gave a "constitutional nod" to racial segregation in public places, foreclosing legal challenges against increasingly-segregated institutions throughout the South. The railcars in Plessy notwithstanding, the black facilities in these institutions were decidedly inferior to white ones, creating a kind of racial caste society. However, in the landmark decision Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the "separate but equal" doctrine was abruptly overturned when a unanimous Supreme Court ruled that segregating children by race in public schools was "inherently unequal" and violated the Fourteenth Amendment. Brown provided a major catalyst for the civil rights movement (1955-68), which won social, not just political and civil, racial equality before the law. After four decades, Justice Harlan's dissent became the law of the land. Following Brown, the Supreme Court has consistently ruled racial segregation in public settings to be unconstitutional. </span>
You might be interested in
What is the definition of a word called
Anon25 [30]
Which kind of called 
to cry out in a loud voice
to command or request to come
or to communicate or try to communicate with by telephone 
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Reread lines 31-39 the death of the hired man what do these lines reveal about Silas and Mary character traits how does this inf
svp [43]

Answer:

These lines reveal Silas as a quiter and unfaithful, careless and with a false pride.

Explanation:

The plot is supported as he is found asleep beside the stove, he comes back when he needs money for tobacco in the winter when Warren and Mary don't need the help, but when they do need help Silas leaves, so Warren is done, disappointed, frustrated, Silas is taking advantage of him, and Warren doesn't care if he's young or old-he didn't do his job and that's all that matters.

Mary doesn't want to hurt Silas' feelings, but Warren knows that Silas needs to learn a lesson, and Mary and Warren don't just have the extra money to give Silas.

7 0
3 years ago
How do you describe someone who acts like the whole world revolves around them, rude, arrogant, and those not have regard for ot
DiKsa [7]

Answer:

An egocentric person

Explanation:

thinking only of oneself, without regard for the feelings or desires of others; self-centred.

"egocentric loners with an overinflated sense of self-worth"

4 0
3 years ago
Friar says, “Wisely and slow, they stumble that run fast.” What does this mean?
ella [17]
2 is the correct answer, I hope this helps!
8 0
2 years ago
While her family and the doctor think she dies because of a heart attack due to the joy of her husband being alive, what is the
storchak [24]

Answer:

Mallard's life would not have ended an hour later but would simply have gone on as it had been. Yet another irony at the end of the story is the diagnosis of the doctors. They say she died of "heart disease--of joy that kills

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 'let's not sell this house' ,said sangita.(into indirect speech)​
    15·1 answer
  • Read this excerpt from Frederick Douglass’s speech “The Hypocrisy of American Slavery.” Fellow citizens, pardon me, and allow me
    10·2 answers
  • What introduces characters, setting, and sometimes the<br> conflict
    15·2 answers
  • Which genre uses narrative techniques to provide a glimpse into the human experience?
    9·1 answer
  • 12) Please help, what central idea does this paragraph introduce?
    14·1 answer
  • The children stared The two headed moster
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement best infers Orwell's purpose in writing
    6·2 answers
  • What is the purpose of a body paragraph? O A. To introduce the main topic of the essay O B. To provide details to support the es
    5·1 answer
  • Match each word to the sentence that uses its synonym.
    14·1 answer
  • Part A
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!