The two days Lauren doesn't receive pay would be $150 × 2 = $300
Add on the cost of transportation & lodging: $300 + $250 = $550
Finally, add the cost of the concert ticket: $550 + $50 = $600
The opportunity cost of Lauren's decision to attend the concert is $600.
The court would rule in sue's favor because courts seldom inquire into the adequacy of consideration.
In contracts, <em>consideration </em>just means the <em>exchange of things of value</em>. There has to be an exchange of things of value for there to be an enforceable contract, and in this case a watch was exchanged for money. It is rare for courts to rule on how much consideration is expected because people are generally free to set their own prices and not sell if the price is too low. That is not for a court to decide (in most cases).
Answer:
D
Explanation:
B and C dont make sense A is that you can never run out of things in stock
Answer:
workers may provide less-than-expected work effort.
Explanation:
Principal-agent problem
This is also called Agency problem. It is simply defined as a type of problem of motivating one party that is the agent just to act on behalf of another person which is the principal. This problems arise usually when incentives between the agent and the principal are not perfectly aligned or in tune.
This form of problem is also said to occur when agents example a firm's managers tends to run after their own personal goals rather than the goals of the principals who is the firm's owners.
Agency relationship
This form of relationship is said to occur if there is a set up or an arrangement in where one person's welfare is dependent or based on what another person does.
Agent
This is simply known as an Individual whose services has being employed by a principal so as to help achieve the principal's objective.
Principle
This is also known as a person who simply employs the services of one or more agents so as to obtain or achieve an objective.
Answer:
a) Y = 500
b) Wages: 2.5
Rental price: 2.5
c) labor Share of output: 0.370511713 = 37.05%
Explanation:
if K = 100 and L = 100
Y = 500
wages: marginal product of labor = value of an extra unit of labor
dY/dL (slope of the income function considering K constant while L variable)
With K = 100 and L = 100
Y' = 2.5
rental: marginal product of land = value of an extra unit of land
dY/dK (slope of the income function considering K variable while L constant)
L = 100 K = 100
Y' = 2.5
c) we use logarithmic properties:
50 was the land while 10 the labor
2.698970004 = 1.698970004 + 1
share of output to labor: 1/2.698970004 = 0.370511713
