The argument in favor of US economic aid to other nations is invalid because the premises do not relate to the conclusion.
An argument is valid when all the premises are true and build a true conclusion.
According to the above, the argument presented has the following premises:
- Foreign economic aid to other countries is a good investment for the United States.
- It comprises only one percent of the entire federal budget, about $ 20 billion.
And the conclusion it presents is:
- Returns untold amounts in increased sales of American goods and services.
According to the above, the argument is a fallacy because the premises are not related to the conclusion because:
An investment is an economic contribution to receive a later profit, in this case, the United States is investing, and those who are receiving the profit are private US companies. Furthermore, no argument is presented that relates the increase in sales of goods and services with this investment.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/2645376
Answer:
The Truman Doctrine demonstrated that the United States would not return to ... both economically and militarily to contain the spread of communism around the world. ... One of the most pressing problems in the immediate aftermath of World War II ... in combatting the spread of communism: economic aid or military force?
Explanation:
Answer:
fed. regulation of business
social reform
political reform
woman's suffrage
Explanation:
commerce act has to do with business
prohibition is people outlawing alcohol to stop people from drinking excessively
statewide primary system has to do with voting
The battles were fought on April 19, 1775 in Middlesex County, Province of Massachusetts Bay, within the towns of Lexington, Concord, Lincoln, Menotomy (present-day Arlington), and Cambridge. They marked the outbreak of armed conflict between the Kingdom of Great Britain and its thirteen colonies in America.
