1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mama L [17]
3 years ago
5

Compared to the South during the Civil War, the North had more *

History
2 answers:
Gnoma [55]3 years ago
7 0
The answer should be B !!!!
Olenka [21]3 years ago
4 0
Hi again and the answer is B
You might be interested in
What decision did the Supreme Court reach in Dred Scott v. Sandford?
loris [4]

Answer:

There have been many decisions in the history of the US Supreme Court that are hard to call democratic. In the British North American colonies, and then in the USA, the legal foundations of the institution of slavery were created. The English legal system ruled out slavery, but gradually in the local laws of the colonies, and later in the Constitution of the United States and in the case-law of the Supreme Court of the United States, the grounds were formulated on which slaves were considered not to be human subjects, but property. This practice has led to the fact that, shortly before the Civil War, a racist attitude was legalized not only towards slaves, but also to the entire black population of the United States, as is clearly seen in the case of Dread Scott v. Sandford.

Dread Scott was a slave whose owner John Emerson took him from Missouri, the state where slavery was allowed, to Illinois, where slavery was prohibited. A few years later, Scott returned to Missouri with Emerson. Scott believed that since he lived in a free state, he should no longer be considered a slave.

Emerson died in 1843, and three years later, Scott sued Emerson's widow, demanding his freedom. In 1850, he won the case in one of the Missouri courts, but in 1852, the state supreme court overturned the lower court. Meanwhile, Ms. Emerson remarried, and Scott became the legal property of her brother John Sanford. Scott sued Sanford to regain his freedom. The case was investigated in one of the federal courts, which in 1854 ruled against Sanford.

When this case was referred to the Supreme Court, its members decided that Scott did not become free by virtue of his living in a free state and that, being a black man, he is not a citizen and, therefore, has no right to file a lawsuit with a court in force according to the norms of general and statutory law. This decision was widely criticized and contributed to the election of Abraham Lincoln as president.

The judgment in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case was declared unconstitutional by the thirteenth constitutional amendment, which abolished slavery in 1865, and the fourteenth amendment, which granted citizenship to former slaves in 1868.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What event took place in November 1945 involving allied nations and twenty-four Nazis were accused of committing war crimes agai
scoundrel [369]
It was the Nuremburg trials
8 0
2 years ago
How do the long telegram, the Truman Doctrine, and the Marshall Plan create a cohesive foreign policy? Cite specific examples to
Lana71 [14]

Answer: In February 1946, George F. Kennan's transmission from Moscow was published in the Kennan-Roosevelt Telegram, which is now known as the Kennan-Roosevelt Telegram.

Explanation: Kennan's "Long Telegram" was the cornerstone of the United States' "containment" strategy against the Soviet Union for the duration of the Cold War.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was included in the republican party of 1854? four answers
vodomira [7]
In Ripon, Wisconsin, former members of the Whig Party meet to establish a new party to oppose the spread of slavery into the western territories. The Whig Party, which was formed in 1834 to oppose the “tyranny” of President Andrew Jackson, had shown itself incapable of coping with the national crisis over slavery. With the successful introduction of the Kansas-Nebraska Bill of 1854, an act that dissolved the terms of the Missouri Compromise and allowed slave or free status to be decided in the territories by popular sovereignty, the Whigs disintegrated. By February 1854, anti-slavery Whigs had begun meeting in the upper midwestern states to discuss the formation of a new party. One such meeting, in Wisconsin on March 20, 1854, is generally remembered as the founding meeting of the Republican Party.
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were the city of new orleans and the mississippi river important to farmers in the early 1800's?
Ne4ueva [31]
Because it allowed them to not only water their crops  during the planting season,but also allowed them to take their crops to market in New Orleans and sell them
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was Richard Nixon's attitude toward "big"<br><br> Government?
    15·1 answer
  • Discuss the state’s rights issue.
    15·1 answer
  • An abundance, or amount, of a good or service decreases its price.
    9·1 answer
  • What were main effects of the russian revolution?
    15·1 answer
  • In his argument with his father, Haemon uses ethos when he says,”
    10·1 answer
  • Where were silk products cocoons found in china a) in mulberrys trees b) in miliet seeds c) on terraced farms d) in rice paddies
    8·2 answers
  • How was the Mississippi territory different than northwest territory
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the siege of the Alamo?
    6·1 answer
  • What is the main purpose of this song?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a justification for the increase in US defense spending during the Cold War? The United States needed
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!