1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Natali5045456 [20]
3 years ago
14

When are collective nouns said to be plural?

English
2 answers:
DIA [1.3K]3 years ago
8 0

Collective nouns are said to be plural when there is more than one group.

<u>Option: C</u>

<u>Explanation:</u>

A collection of supposed items as a whole is understood as a collective noun. Some collective nouns are not limited to one kind of thing in everyday conversation, such as the word community which can be imposed on people, dogs or other items. Typically, collective nouns follow a singular verb since they are singular in structure but often they take a plural verb. Using a plural verb while community members behave as individuals. The jury were permitted to go home to their families every day, for an instance.

torisob [31]3 years ago
3 0

Collective nouns are said to be plural (A) when there is more than one of the same kind of group

Explanation:

A collective noun can be singular or plural depending on the context  of the sentence. In the first example below, the goat is considered as one unit. Therefore, goat is considered singular. However, in the second example, the goats  is considered as lots of individuals, and goat is considered plural.

Examples:

The goat was moving north.  

(singular – considered as one unit)

The goats were darting in all directions.  

(plural – considered as individuals)

Let take an example to understand this concept- Nouns such as 'sheep' or 'fish', when used collectively, are said to be  morphologically singular but they are semantically plural.  'Fish' accepts the morphologically plural form 'fishes' when referring to species of fish.similarly 'sheep' accepts the morphologically plural form 'fishes'

You might be interested in
Maizie is going to give a real-time presentation next week. She has given recorded online speeches before, but this is her first
azamat

Answer and explanation:

I believe there are several differences she will notice, but two of them will strike her more acutely.

First, she will be looking at her audience. Speaking to a camera is far from being as intimidating as speaking to a group of real people who is right in front of you. Seeing their reactions - interest, drowsiness, boredom, laughter etc. - may interfere in Maizie's performance. She will process what she sees with neutrality, positivity, or negativity. She will feel certain emotions in connection to those interpretations which may, therefore, cause her to be more or less nervous.

Another difference she will notice is the fact that there is no editing to what she is saying. When recording something, editing is always a possibility, unless, of course, we are talking of a live stream. But in general, if you're making mistakes, you can cut and start over, or simply let it roll and then edit those mistakes out. In a real-time presentation, mistakes will be made and seen/heard by the audience immediately. It takes composure, poise, and the ability to laugh at oneself to keep the presentation going.

7 0
3 years ago
“For nonconformity, the world whips you with its displeasure,” is an example of which type of figurative language?
andrew-mc [135]
Personification

It is personification because the qualities of earth, or moreover, society, are given human-like abilities.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the passage.
jek_recluse [69]

Answer:

B. Luz trained with Coach Davis, and with practice Luz excelled at the sport.

8 0
3 years ago
In a paragraph, discuss how the character trait of determination in Jerry in "Through the Tunnel" advances the plot of the short
Tanya [424]
In a paragraph, discuss how the character trait of determination in Jerry in "Through the Tunnel" advances the plot of the short story.
5 0
3 years ago
Are modern critics overcompensating by finding too much value in works by members of marginalized communities?
konstantin123 [22]

Answer:

Certainly not. Though there are a large number of modern critics who are lavishing praise upon praise for works by marginalised authors, that praise is well-justified. Consider that these authors not only had to write a book about their lives, they also had to have the courage to speak up about the prejudice and injustice they faced. Any book by a marginalised author is well-worth the praise for just existing.

\\

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Write a narrative essay about overcoming a challenge, and what you learned as a result.
    13·2 answers
  • I did to know facts about the frilled shark maybe 3 or 4
    9·2 answers
  • Write an article on the topic "What do city children want?"
    11·1 answer
  • How are spoken word and poetry slams similar to storytelling in the 14th century
    14·1 answer
  • How does the story the monkey's paw create suspense?
    14·1 answer
  • Which quotation from julius caesar is an example of a literary allusion?
    14·1 answer
  • Lisa had to write a 10-page paper for her art history class, but she was suffering from a serious case of writer's block. She be
    10·1 answer
  • Hi guy can you help me to make a introductory paragraph about smartphone. Please I need only introductory.
    15·1 answer
  • Which type of investment can produce a high return but exposes the investor to a high level of risk?
    15·2 answers
  • Use conjunctions
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!