1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
eimsori [14]
3 years ago
14

A loophole that many green-collar criminals have found with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 is that it only protects the anim

als and not the species’ habitat.
a. True
b. Flase
Law
1 answer:
olya-2409 [2.1K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

False

Explanation:

The Endangered Species Act of 1973 is a law that was passed in the United States in order to protect endangered species. This law was signed by President Richard Nixon in 1973, and it was designed to limit the damage caused by economic growth and development. This was an important step in conservation in the country, and it was considered to be the most comprehensive legislation for the preservation of species of any nation. The law not only defends the animals themselves, but also the ecosystems upon which these animals depend.

You might be interested in
How much did jeff bezos wife get in their divorce settlement
Akimi4 [234]

Answer: $38billion

Explanation:

Mackenzie who married Jeff in 1993 a year before he started Amazon from his garage in Seattle, has said she had a disproportionate amount of money to share, and this makes her the third richest women in the world and the greatest divorce of all time. Jeff Bezos still remain the world's richest individual with a $118billion fortune.

3 0
3 years ago
Pick one
olga55 [171]

Answer:

option 2

Explanation:

the second one is more explanitory

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
19. Which of these vehicles must stop before crossing railroad tracks?
Allushta [10]

Answer:

Trucks transporting hazardous loads must stop before they cross railroad tracks.

4 0
3 years ago
Process of evidence recording? ​
oksano4ka [1.4K]

Recording or documenting evidence as it stands organized is a necessary component of the complaint investigation procedure.

<h3>What is Evidence Recording?</h3>

Recording or documenting evidence as it stands organized is a necessary component of the complaint investigation procedure. In the midst of an intense interview or a complex observation, it exists possible to forget to create adequate notes or overlook recording important information about how the information existed acquired. Such lapses, however, can seriously harm the research because essential facts may be forgotten or overlooked. Inadequate notes can also generate situations should any resulting sanction be appealed.

Interviews – written notes or audio recorded:

  • Record the interviewee’s name, address, telephone number, and connection to the certified program/incident. If others exist present during the interview, this should also be reported along with remembering information. In the rare instances when a child exists interviewed, record the date of birth.

  • Note: because interview notes exist potentially subject to public disclosure, the certification worker must be aware of confidentiality provisions. Record the location and the beginning and stop periods of all interviews.

  • Document the questions posed to the interviewee and their response. The certification worker should endeavor to keep the interviewee on track via skillful interviewing. Sometimes, however, superfluous data will be offered. It is normally sufficient to document statements as created and make editing decisions at a later point in the investigation.

  • At the judgment of the certification worker, the interviewee may be requested to read written interview notes and sign and date them suggesting that the notes accurately describe what the interviewee said.

Observations:

The certification worker should carefully document where the observation occurs, the start/stop time, the names of persons present and their relationship to the certified program/incident, and a factual narrative or bullet presentation of what is observed. The observation may be signed by the person(s) making them who can testify to the facts.

Affidavits and written statements:

The value of the information obtained is considerably enhanced if a witness or collateral contact is willing to make a written statement of the information furnished. Generally, the statement maker should write the statement, but this is not mandatory. In some cases, the certification worker may write the statement for the person and have every page read by, or read to, and signed and dated by the statement maker. The statement maker’s name, address, telephone number and relationship to the center / incident should be included in the statement.

Photographs:

Photographs exist good, primary evidence, as they demonstrate an objective, factual and objective record. However, they can only document visual compliance or noncompliance with certification needs. They cannot reflect the lack of some activity, object, or person because whatever exists absent could be just outside the camera’s field of vision. Photographs should be labeled with the place, time and date carried and the name(s) of a person who exists able to testify to that evidence. When a photograph lives taken of a child(ren), the confidentiality of the child(ren) shall be maintained. To the extent practicable, avoid photographing faces.

Diagrams / program floor plans:

Sometimes it may be helpful to draw a diagram of the area of objects, program staff, and so forth. This may be particularly helpful when documenting visual barriers, etc. Diagrams should be as near to scale as possible - and should be labeled and dated by the drawer.

Program documents:

The most original document exists always the best evidence to contain. However, the certification worker might have to utilize a photocopy of an original document or simply record information from monitored records. Notes on photocopies or observations should contain information about what the document designates, the date and where it existed collected, and the name of the individual who is able to testify to that evidence.

Records from other Agencies:

During the course of a complaint examination, the certification worker may require to obtain a record(s) from other agencies or offices. When a document exists obtained, it stands best practice if the person providing it proves that the document(s) exists as a true and actual copy. Some agencies or offices, particularly court agencies and law enforcement, have their own certification format.

To learn more about Evidence Recording refer to:

brainly.com/question/27346773

#SPJ9

3 0
2 years ago
Abdel fields vs United States explained
ioda

Answer:

gigigigiggiigiggigigigigiggggg

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Harry Potter accelerated reader test
    9·2 answers
  • What cause and effect relationships have to do with vehicles and air
    13·1 answer
  • Are executive orders ever unconstitutional?
    14·1 answer
  • On a long trip, follow your _______, and stop when you are tired.
    12·2 answers
  • The US Supreme Court ruled the Erdman Act was unConstitutional because Select one: a. it interfered in due process of law b. all
    15·1 answer
  • The two main groupings of nations during World War II were the Allied Powers and the Axis Powers
    13·1 answer
  • 29 PTS...Kant or Rawls?
    13·2 answers
  • Okay so this isn’t for homework, I was just curious.
    15·2 answers
  • The chart above outlines the relationships central to a social contract. The Declaration of Independence was an action best desc
    14·2 answers
  • Chính quyền và mỗi công dân cần làm gì để hiến pháp đc tôn trọng nhất
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!