Answer:
This took me a long time to figure out , but I'm pretty sure number 1 is
D) Silk and Wool.
And number 2 is C) Northern Nigeria
Explanation: Hope that's right, sorry if not because for number 1 most of them could be the answer, and for number 2, three of them could be the answer.
Answer:
Opportunity cost
Explanation:
The opportunity cost Bob's brother Joe $20,000. Remember, the term Opportunity cost refers to the cost (loss in this context) incurred when one forgoes an alternative best option–holding them in a brokerage account, in place for a less beneficial one.
Thus, Bob chose the best alternative over his brother.
Answer:
The company's current ratio increased.
Explanation:
What would happen to this company is that the company's current ratio would increase. The current ratio refers to a ratio that measures the company's capacity to fulfill its short-term obligations, usually within a year. Therefore, this can also be considered a liquidity ratio. The way in which it does it is by comparing the company's current assets to its current liabilities. The current ration in this case would increase due to the fact that the company used the money to pay off some of its short-term notes payable.
Answer: 35.29%
Explanation:
Municipal Bonds are attractive in that they give the tax benefit of being tax exempt whereas a corporate bond is liable for taxation. The tax rate that will therefore make an investor indifferent between the two bonds is the one that will equate the Corporate bond's yield net of tax to the yield on the Municipal bond.
5.5% = 8.5% * ( 1 - x)
5.5% = 8.5% - 0.085x
0.085x = 8.5% - 5.5%
0.085x = 3%
x = 35.29%
Answer:
Confront theories predictions with evidence
Explanation:
To test economic theories, economists would observe real behavior and test it with data from the real world. Which would in turn provide evidence based on what is being tested. Confronting theories predictions with evidence is a pointer to the fact that economic theories are verifiable and their validity can be tested.
