A false dilemma is a type of informal fallacy in which something is falsely claimed to be an "either/or" situation, when in fact there is at least one additional option.
The false dilemma fallacy can also arise simply by accidental omission of additional options rather than by deliberate deception. For example, "Stacey spoke out against capitalism, therefore she must be a communist" (she may be neither capitalist nor communist). "Roger opposed an atheist argument against Christianity, so he must be a Christian" (When it's assumed the opposition by itself means he's a Christian). Roger might be an atheist who disagrees with the logic of some particular argument against Christianity. Additionally, it can be the result of habitual tendency, whatever the cause, to view the world with limited sets of options.
Some philosophers and scholars believe that "unless a distinction can be made rigorous and precise it isn't really a distinction". An exception is analytic philosopher John Searle, who called it an incorrect assumption that produces false dichotomies.Searle insists that "it is a condition of the adequacy of a precise theory of an indeterminate phenomenon that it should precisely characterize that phenomenon as indeterminate; and a distinction is no less a distinction for allowing for a family of related, marginal, diverging cases."Similarly, when two options are presented, they often are, although not always, two extreme points on some spectrum of possibilities; this may lend credence to the larger argument by giving the impression that the options are mutually exclusive of each other, even though they need not be. Furthermore, the options in false dichotomies typically are presented as being collectively exhaustive, in which case the fallacy may be overcome, or at least weakened, by considering other possibilities, or perhaps by considering a whole spectrum of possibilities, as in fuzzy logic.
Answer:
John's reaction to the chicken being killed foreshadows his quality of being a civil rights activist.
Explanation:
"Preaching to the Chickens: The Story of Young John Lewis" is a book written by Jabari Asim, portraying the life of young John Lewis.
After John Lewis began to take care of the chickens on his farm, he took it as an opportunity to hone his preaching. He began to consider the chickens on farm as his congregation. When his parents would take chickens to kill and cook them, he would refuse to eat chicken and would not talk to his parents. He asserts that this form of showing disapproval marked a beginning in his life as a non-violent protesters. So, in this way, John's reaction to the chicken being killed foreshadow his future as a civil rights activist. He, at an early age, began to defend those who were not able to speak for themselves.
Answer:
This would not be considered an effective analogy because the two topics being discussed do not have any similarities.
The phrases foggy night, hidden, and spread thy close curtain all support the theme of gloom. So,<em> closed curtain, cloudy night, eyes may wink, and unseen</em> are the correct words and phrases.
<h3>What is the significance of the dark motif?</h3>
On an overcast night, all of the stars should be visible. When this happens, the sky will get even darker due to the fact that all sources of light will be blocked.
Being hidden also supports the idea that it was too dark outside for anybody to see Romeo come to see her, as well as the fact that there was a dark enough location in which Romeo could navigate without fear of guards catching sight of him.
The phrase "spread thy tight curtain" refers to the darkness and Juliet's expectation that curtains will appear to cover the sky.
The line "runaway's eyes may wink" could be added as an extra phrase. Juliet refers to the night as "runaway," however she also sees the stars as "eyes," blinking.
For more information about Act III fo Romeo and Juliet, refer below
brainly.com/question/26770655
