1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Allisa [31]
4 years ago
7

If the supreme court had decided differently in gibbons v. ogden or mcculloch v. maryland, what might be one result today?

History
1 answer:
Nutka1998 [239]4 years ago
6 0

<span>If the Supreme Court had decided differently in Gibbons V. Ogden or Mcculloch V. Maryland, Maryland may be able to established bank. The McCulloch v. Maryland is one of the most significant cases of the Supreme Court in relation to the federal power. The Supreme Court believed that the Congress has inferred authorities get from Article I, Section 8 or the “Necessary and Proper” clause. It provided the Congress the authority to establish a national bank.</span>

You might be interested in
The first step in creating a public policy involves implementing a plan. enforcing a plan. developing a plan. identifying a plan
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]

In my opinion, the answer would be C. Developing a plan.

Because in order to implement a plan you have to have a plan, and enforce a plan means you have to have a plan as well. And as for identify a plan that means you have to have some ideas to go off of.

So your best option is C. Developing a plan.

I hope this helps. If you need any further help on this or any other question, just ask. I am here to help.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does the map suggest about challenges faced by Austria-Hungary?
Ksenya-84 [330]

Answer:

Its A.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read more about the Watergate investigation by the Washington Post, and then look through the Watergate files of the Ford Presid
miskamm [114]

Answer:

You might have chosen individuals like Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward, or John Dean and Mark “Deep Throat” Felt, or John Ehrlichman and G. Gordon Liddy. Woodward and Bernstein could represent the role of investigative journalism in acting as a check on government power. Dean and Felt could represent the role of people with integrity within the government exposing the misdeeds of others. Ehrlichman and Liddy could represent the abuse of power of those empowered by an administration with misguided ethics.

8 0
4 years ago
The bureaucracy created by the emperor claudius was made up of
slamgirl [31]
<span>The bureaucracy created by the emperor Claudius was made up of "</span>his own ex-slaves".

Claudius was not considered a successful person before he was hailed as an emperor, but later he proved to be a successful and powerful ruler. He introduced many reforms in his reign, from feeding his citizens in drought to making law and order situation best of the time. 

8 0
3 years ago
Explain three ways in which positive and dangerous leaders use their leadership to achieve different goals? How might the goals
Montano1993 [528]

Let's begin by defining what a leader is. A leader is someone who supports his/her subordinates in all possible way so followers can be engaged to the goals. Now, there are positive and dangerous leaders. These are three ways both kinds of leaders use their leadership to achieve different goals:

1) They use their authority to impose their point of view regardless of what others think. This is dangerous.

2) They know their influence to get know their team in all aspects. He is very well aware of their team's weaknesses and strengths. Therefore, he will make educated decisions on assigning tasks to achieve their goals. This is positive.

3) They are willing and determined to destroy others who may be on their way just to get what they want. When I say destroy, I mean they might undermine someone's integrity to get rid of him/her.


Now, dangerous leaders do have their own goals. Most of the time, such goals are connected to their own interests. Thus, this dangerous leader will try to do anything to achieve them. For examples, they might badmouth others, make up toxic stories about colleagues. They could even damage the team whole image and blame on them just to get what they want.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which best describes a major impact of the U.S. Constitution?
    14·1 answer
  • How do we know that the people of the Indus River Valley traded with the rest of the ancient world?
    10·1 answer
  • What was a provision of Magna Carta?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following MOST influenced the creation of the Constitution?​
    13·2 answers
  • Why were many republicans opposed to the new deal
    8·1 answer
  • Which action best served to help Democrats regain power in the south during reconstruction
    9·1 answer
  • When Stephen F. Austin returned to Texas after his time in prison, what message did he have for his fellow Texans?
    7·1 answer
  • How does Hitler and the Nazi Party appeal to voters and ultimately gain complete power in Germany? PLEASE acually answer the qus
    15·2 answers
  • Which action completes this diagram
    5·2 answers
  • what do you think the long term good effect of our obedience to the 6th and 7th commandment? what will happen if we disobey it?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!