1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lady_Fox [76]
3 years ago
8

Explain ONE way in which the Umayyad rulers in Córdoba were

History
1 answer:
Fofino [41]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:The Umayyads  oversaw a rapid expansion of territory, extending as far west as Spain and as far east as India, allowing both Islam and the Arabic language to spread over a vast area.

you know how language is power right g

You might be interested in
What's the counterargument of the Declaration of Independence
Ira Lisetskai [31]
All men are equal and have inalienable rights.
4 0
3 years ago
How did classical Greece and Rome influence artistic and literary achievement in the Italian city-states?
kakasveta [241]
When the Renaissance came, all of the diff, types of art came together.
3 0
3 years ago
What is the best explanation for why the federal government instituted the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution?
allochka39001 [22]
A . The Emancipation Proclamation did not provide legal protection for the civil rights of African American.

The Emancipation Proclamation did not give them any specific rights except for their freedom. It made it illegal to own a person, but they still experienced racism. The government created the 14th and 15th Amendment to provide them with some basic rights.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do the preambles to the US and Florida Constitutions have in common? Check all that apply.
Taya2010 [7]
Both claim to represent the citizens
8 0
3 years ago
Read the excerpt below from the Supreme Court ruling in the Scott v. Sandford. [T]he legislation and histories of the times, and
omeli [17]
The main point of this excerpt is that African-Americans were not considered US citizens.

In the Supreme Court case Dred Scott vs. Sandford, Scott is suing for his freedom from slavery. This is because his master brought him to the Wisconsin territory, a territory where slavery was outlawed.

However, the Supreme Court ruled against him. The reason why they ruled against him is based on the excerpt above. The Declaration of Independence did not make it blatantly clear that slaves were considered citizens. Since they were not considered citizens, they had no legal rights that slave owners had to respect.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What are 3 examples of foreign conflicts that the United States was involved with
    11·2 answers
  • How did child labor laws affect children's employment levels during the Progressive Era?
    7·1 answer
  • How did hamilton feel about political power and the common people
    14·1 answer
  • what were the roles of the federalist papers , Alexander Hamilton, and James Madison in the formation of the US Constitution?
    9·1 answer
  • 1. Why did the New England colonies NOT base their economy on agriculture?
    6·1 answer
  • Which term best describes wealthy business owners who often engaged in unfair or anti-competitive business practices?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following enabled the United States to establish a permanent military presence on the Asian mainland?
    8·1 answer
  • After the Revolutionary War the British were eager to trade with the powerful United States True False​
    5·1 answer
  • Why did John Thomas Jefferson believe to be unalienable rights. select all that apply
    14·2 answers
  • What topic did the abolitionist<br> movement address during the<br> antebellum period?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!