Simplify (8^2/3)^4 on edge
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer: The answer in simplest form is
Step-by-step explanation:
In Wyatt's method I observed the mixed fraction was converted to simple fraction in the second step.
Therefore Wyatt's solution will be:
Distributive property was used in Abigail's method.
The solution would be:
Note: Complete question is contained in the image
Answer: $2,150,000
Explanation: Let
T = Total expenses of Joint-Serve
Then, before the company acquired robotic assemblers, the expenses allocated for payroll is given by
Expenses for Payroll = 43% of Total Expenses
Expenses for Payroll = 0.43T (1)
(Because 43% = 0.43)
Because the total expenses increased by $250,000 after spending for robotic assemblers, the total expenses = T + 250,000
So, the payroll expense is now calculated as
Expenses for Payroll = 38% of Total Expenses
Expenses for Payroll = 0.38(T + 250,000) (2)
(Because 38% = 0.38 and total expenses = T + 250,000)
By comparing equations (1) and (2),
Thus, the total expense before the purchase of robotic assemblers is T = $ 1,900,000. Therefore, the total expense after purchasing the robotic assemblers is T + 250,000 = 1,900,000 + 250,000 = $2,150,000
Explanation: Let
T = Total expenses of Joint-Serve
Then, before the company acquired robotic assemblers, the expenses allocated for payroll is given by
Expenses for Payroll = 43% of Total Expenses
Expenses for Payroll = 0.43T (1)
(Because 43% = 0.43)
Because the total expenses increased by $250,000 after spending for robotic assemblers, the total expenses = T + 250,000
So, the payroll expense is now calculated as
Expenses for Payroll = 38% of Total Expenses
Expenses for Payroll = 0.38(T + 250,000) (2)
(Because 38% = 0.38 and total expenses = T + 250,000)
By comparing equations (1) and (2),
Thus, the total expense before the purchase of robotic assemblers is T = $ 1,900,000. Therefore, the total expense after purchasing the robotic assemblers is T + 250,000 = 1,900,000 + 250,000 = $2,150,000