3 years ago

Should people have the option of not participating in their government?

2 answers:

7 0

In my opinion it depends on where you live. In the US i believe that due to there being a right to having freedom of religion and beliefs, it would make the most sense to grant freedom concerning politics. I wouldn't necessarily participate with the government as frequent if i was given the choice, but everyone's different.

Rashid [163]3 years ago

3 0

Yeah, why not? That's why we call it freedom.

You might be interested in

The part of the us government that carries out laws is

dalvyx [7]

That is the Executive branch.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The real purpose of teddy roosevelt's assault on trusts was to

Tpy6a [65]

The primary purpose of Teddy Roosevelt's fight against trusts was to show both US residents and the world that businesses were not in charge of the country–the government was.

Hope I could help!

6 0

3 years ago

What is the code of Hammurabi?? is it an eye for an eye and a foot for a foot ??

Lina20 [59]

The Code of Hammurabi is inscribed on this seven-foot basalt stele. The stele is now at the Louvre. The Code of Hammurabi refers to a set of rules or laws enacted by the Babylonian King Hammurabi.

4 0

3 years ago

The city of berlin, which was located deep inside the soviet zone of a postwar divided germany, was

olchik [2.2K]

Was the Berlin Wall

5 0

3 years ago

Why were the Indians pleased with the creation of the proclamation line of 1763

Evgen [1.6K]

They were pleased because this would keep the people from moving into their land

6 0

3 years ago