Necesito B para enviar este paquete
Probably the noblest and most humane purpose of punishment in the criminal law is rehabilitation. When a citizen's criminal tendencies are "cured" (in a manner of speaking) so that he or she never has the urge to commit crime again and, even further, becomes a productive member of society, then society is not only protected from future harm but it's also made richer by the successful re-entry of one of its members. It's a win-win situation in which both society and criminal offenders benefit.
Idealogically, rehabilitation is a very sound goal for punishment. It's pleasant and beautiful to imagine the successful general rehabilitation of society's criminals. If only adult criminals could be successfully rehabilitated, then the phenomenon of crime could be all but eliminated, and criminal offenses restricted from then on to juvenile delinquency and the occasional act of passion.
Ah, if only. While few seriously argue against the utility of reforming criminal offenders, there are powerful arguments against placing too much importance on rehabilitation, not the least of which is that it tends not to work. In 1994, over sixty percent of criminal offenders who were released from U.S. correctional facilities were arrested again within three years or less. Fifty percent went back into the system. High recidivism rates are a powerful argument against the effectiveness of rehabilitation in the criminal law. It is time-consuming and dubious effort to meaningfully reform serious criminals, and it costs more for tax-payers. However fine and noble the idea of reforming criminals into productive members of society may be, the statistics alone speak out strongly against the attempt.
On the other hand, it is probably a bit much to argue that criminal offenders are fundamentally unworthy of the efforts of rehabilitation, and that it's good for them to suffer for what they've done without any help or reprieve. Perhaps. In the real world, many criminals may be truly un-reformable, and any attempt to rehabiliate them would be a waste of effort and resources. Also, the pain of crime victims and their loved ones cannot be ignored or reasoned away, and to deny them some feeling of satisfied vengeance could be seen as an abject failure of the justice system. But, all things considered, it is at least feasable for a society that cherishes the precept "innocent until proven guilty" to some day place equal value on the precept "reformable until proven otherwise." Of course, the only way to prove this is to try.
Answer:
Se
Explanation:
The answer is se because saber is the term used for if you know something or of someone, you would use conocer if you knew a person personally
<span>The first question is asking what you would like to buy in a shoe store. So, the answer will be shoes: zapatos. The second question is a bit trickier. There are two parts to using the verb "gustar." First, you have to know how to conjugate it. Second, you have to know which indirect object pronoun to use before "gustar." The sentence is literally saying: Music is pleasing to us (We like music). In this sentence, we know how to conjugate "gustar" by what comes after it. "Escuchar música" is technically a singular thing (listening to music), so "gustar" will be conjugated to "gusta." Next, we know that listening to music is pleasing to us, which means that the pronoun will correspond to nosotros: nos. So, the sentence will read: A nosotros nos gusta escuchar musica. 3. The correct answer is the last option. The conjugation of "gustar" will remain the same, but we are changing the pronoun from "you" to "me": from "te" to "me." 4. The sentence is saying: I listen to CDs with ____. So, the answer will be "ears": los oídos (ojos is eyes and labios is lips). 5. The sentences say: Marisa buys some sandals and shoes in the store. The sandals cost 27 pesos. The shoes cost 30 pesos. How many total pesos does Marisa pay to the cashier? To find the answer, simply add the two together: 27 + 30 = 57. So, the correct answer is 57 pesos. 6. The sentence is saying: I read the science book with ____. So, the answer will be "eyes": los ojos. 7. Depending on the image, "el pan" will be a picture of bread, "las frutas" will be fruit, "el arroz" will be rice, and "la leche" will be milk. 8. The question is asking: How much does the meat cost? So, the answer will provide a monetary value: La carne cuesta $5 (The meat costs 5 dollars). 9. The sentence is saying: The cheese is in the ____ section. So, we will want the answer that says dairy: los productos lácteos. </span>
Synonymous worm 7 letters
