Answer:
B) Inflation is everywhere and always a monetary phenomenon.
Explanation:
Henry Thornton developed this theory in 1802. According to the Quantity Theory, In an economy, there is a direct relationship between the quantity of money in the economy and the prices of goods and services. The price levels are directly related to the amount of money in circulation, which is the cause of inflation. Hence the consumer has to pay more for the same amount of commodity.
Answer:
Marketing Plan
Explanation:
The marketing strategy of the company is one of the most crucial components of development and growth for the company.
It includes all the activities in which the company makes a strategy and plan of how shall the product be developed, what should be an approximate level of acceptance of cost, and further how it shall be ultimately delivered to maximum consumers.
It is thus, comprised of various steps involved as it relates to a complete task from the beginning to the end of producing and delivering the product.
Answer:
wearing a suit to a job interview: ethical wearing an expensive suit to impress others not ethical, wearing your best dress suit to a formal banquet ethical wearing a law enforcement uniform to gain respect not ethical, finally wearing a certain type of style clothes to fit in with the desired crowd not ethical hope this helps good luck!
Answer:
B. $140,000
Explanation:
An adjusted basis refers to the total cost of acquiring an asset. In include transportation, installing, commissions, and all other relevant fees. The fair market value represents the price an asset can fetch if sold in the market. It is the amount that a company will receive if it were to dispose of an asset in the market.
Shareholders will be the fair market value adjusted for the mortgage balance.
=$ 230,000 - $ 90,000
=$140,000
Answer:
Yes, Dealer could collect damages from GM because basically GM breached the contract. Any time a contract is breached, the non-breaching party can sue. But the real question here is what amount could the court assign to Dealer as compensation for damages incurred. If you want to rephrase this question, it would be: What damages did Dealer suffer due to GM's breach.
If the damages are not significant, then the court will probably assign some amount for nominal damages. To be honest, the greatest expenses here are actually the legal costs of the lawsuit. Unless Dealer can prove that assigning the contract actually hurt them (which I doubt), then the court will assign a small amount. Sometimes nominal damages can be very small and mostly symbolic, e.g. $1.
