The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the third choice.
<span>If a conditional and its converse are always true, then the statement is a biconditional.
</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!
Answer:
А. New architecture development is causing historic buildings to be destroyed
Explanation:
Option A is the claim in the given passage.
This is true because looking at the passage, we discover that the philosophy of "out with the old, in with the new" is actually being abused. It is stated that across United States, there is the destruction of historic architectural work in order to build malls, high-rise apartments, etc. This means that new architecture development is actually causing historic buildings to be destroyed.
The destruction of such historic buildings is done with the mindset that it is the property that holds the value and not the structure that sits on it. Therefore, the craftsmanship and painstaking details employed during the construction of such structures are ignored.
Option A is the correct answer.
Answer:
Digging up ancient Egyptian tombs teaches us more about the way people lived than hieroglyphs do.
Explanation:
Hello. You did not enter the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
It is only possible to know the impact that Lasher had on Walter's life if you read the text. However, you can consider that this impact was transfomative, if Lasher was able to modify Walter's life in an intense and powerful way. You can consider that this impact was traumatic, if Lasher only promoted disgust and bad experiences for Walter. You can consider that this impact was ordinary, if Lasher did not promote anything intense in Walter's life, without provoking any remarkable and transforming experience. Finally, you can consider that this impact was ambiguous, if at the same time that Lasher promoted good things in Walter's life, he also promoted bad things, making it impossible to determine whether Lasher's presence was positive or negative.