1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iogann1982 [59]
3 years ago
6

What social class would you want to be part of if you were living in medieval Europe, and why?

History
1 answer:
Sholpan [36]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Noble class

Explanation:

Historically, in medieval Europe, the system that was in use was the feudal system and it had three distinct social classes which were:

  • A king
  • A noble class
  • Peasant class

I would like to be part of the noble class which includes nobles, priests, and princes. The noble class rented out their lands to peasants and the King was the one who owned all lands but gave out lands to his nobles for their use.

Being a king would sound like a tempting proposition but personally, I do not think I am cut out for being a King and ruling over a kingdom, so being a noble is the next best thing because I'm just part of the ruling class who rules over the commoners. Moreso, the word 'nobility' in medieval Europe also included members of the society who were in leadership positions because of their wealth, political position or specialized training.

You might be interested in
Explain the historical significance of americanization?
Irina18 [472]
The Americanization movement was a nationwide organized effort in the 1910s to bring millions of recent inmigrants into the American cultural system
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was the fascist leader of italy during ww2
oksano4ka [1.4K]

benito mussolini i believe

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statements best describe Construction careers? Check all that apply.
harina [27]

Answer:

C) They pay well.

D) They are growing slowly.

E) They are demanding.

F) They require teamwork.

H) They require physical strength.

Explanation:

If I messed up on any or forgot one plz tell me!!!

     * I Hope This Helps*

5 0
2 years ago
Choose the answer that best completes the sentence below.
Veronika [31]
But because the statement is contradictory.
7 0
2 years ago
Is America a land of liberty ? Why?
Alex Ar [27]
NO OTHER country puts as much emphasis on “freedom” as the United States. Patrick Henry demanded “liberty or death”. The national anthem calls America “the land of the free”. Great reformers from Abraham Lincoln to Martin Luther King have urged America to live up to its ideal of “freedom”. When a group of French Americanophiles wanted to flatter the United States, they sent the Statue of Liberty.

And no other country boasts as much about its mission to give freedom to the rest of the world. Woodrow Wilson thought that he had a God-given duty to bring liberty to mankind. George Bush regards his foreign policy as a crusade for freedom—“the right and hope of all humanity”.

But how good is America at living up to its own ideals? A new study by Freedom House tries to answer this question. The fact that Freedom House has devoted so much attention to the United States is significant in its own right. Founded in 1941 by a group of Americans who were worried about the advance of fascism, Freedom House is now the world's leading watchdog of liberty. The fact that “Today's American: How Free?” is such a thorough piece of work makes it doubly significant.

The judicious tone of “How Free?” will undoubtedly disappoint leftists. Freedom House bends over backwards to give the authorities the benefit of the doubt. Other countries have recalibrated the balance between freedom and security in the face of terrorists who want to inflict mass casualties on civilians. America's recent sins, however, are minor compared with those of its past. Newspapers have published highly sensitive information without reprisals. Congress and the courts have repeatedly stepped in to restore a more desirable constitutional balance.

But the verdict on the Bush years is nevertheless sharp. “How Free?” not only details and condemns the administration's familiar sins, from Guantánamo to extraordinary rendition to warrantless wiretapping. It reminds readers of its aversion to open government. The number of documents classified as secret has jumped from 8.7m in 2001 to 14.2m in 2005—a 60% increase over three years. Decade-old information has been reclassified. Researchers report that it is much more difficult and time-consuming to obtain information under the Freedom of Information Act.

Government whistleblowers have repeatedly been punished or fired—even when they have been trying to expose threats to national security that their bosses preferred to overlook. Richard Levernier had his security clearance revoked for revealing that some of the country's nuclear facilities were not properly secured. Border security agents have been punished for pointing out that the border is inadequately monitored, and airport baggage-handlers and security people for pointing to weaknesses in the security system. The Office of Special Counsel, which was established to enforce laws designed to protect the rights of such people, is widely regarded as “inept and even hostile to whistleblowers”.

“How Free?” also has some hard things to say about America's criminal-justice system. The incarceration rate exploded from 1.39 per 1,000 in 1980 to 7.5 in 2006, driven, among other things, by the war on drugs. America now has one of the highest rates of imprisonment in the world: 5.6m Americans, or one in every 37 adults, has spent time behind bars. Even though prison-building is one of the country's great growth industries, overcrowding is endemic, with federal prisons operating at 131% of capacity. America is also one of the few countries to ban felons and, in some states, ex-felons from voting. At any one time 4m Americans—one in every 50 adults—is disenfranchised because of past criminal convictions. This includes 1.4m blacks, or 14% of the black male population.

Freedom House's strictures are, if anything, too soft. America insists on criminalising victimless crimes such as prostitution. Last week Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the so-called DC Madam, committed suicide; the government had thrown the book at her, including racketeering and mail fraud, because it really wished to penalise the arranging of assignations between consenting adults. In her suicide note to her mother she wrote that she could not “live the next six-to-eight years behind bars for what you and I have both come to regard as this 'modern-day lynching'.”

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Benjamin Franklin, the best-known American colonist in the 1760s, often delivered fiery speeches against the British. was an wea
    5·2 answers
  • Why did the United States assume global responsibility for containing communism?
    7·1 answer
  • What contributed to the United States’ rise to world power during the early 1900s?
    10·2 answers
  • What GEORGIA politician does this describe?
    11·2 answers
  • What was a primary objective of United States foreign policy during the 1930s
    7·1 answer
  • Why is the loess problematic for the yellow river?
    5·2 answers
  • How did this Supreme Court decision affect judicial interpretations of the Constitution?
    5·2 answers
  • I'll give brainliest if you know the meaning of "ASCE" :)
    6·2 answers
  • 1. Which person was NOT present at the Second Continental Congress?
    15·2 answers
  • GOOD AFTERNOON ALL<br>. <br>. <br>. <br>​
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!