1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OLga [1]
3 years ago
7

Anti-Federalists argued that a Bill of Rights was necessary in order for which of the following selections to occur?

History
1 answer:
kirza4 [7]3 years ago
4 0

The options for this question are:

Select one:

A. to prevent the rise of a tyrant

B. all of these

C. to limit the powers of the federal government

D. to protect individual rights

The correct answer is B: all of the options are correct.

Anti-Federalists were unhappy with the Constitution because it gave, they thought, way too much power to the national government. They felt it didnt properly protected individual liberties or the states from interference and fyranny.

They started campaigning against the rafitication of the Constitution unless a Bill of Rights was made. The founding father James Madison produced several amendments from which 10 were ratified and formed the Bill of Rights.

The Constitution was ratified in 1788 and the Bill of Rights in 1791.

You might be interested in
Question 17 of 20 What is one requirement of the Affordable Care Act? O A. Senior citizens must pay for their own health insuran
elixir [45]

Answer: O D. Everyone has to obtain health care coverage

<em>hope this helps </em><em>:)</em>

4 0
3 years ago
What are the three locations of Phoenicia
o-na [289]
Tyre<span>, </span>Sidon, <span>Byblos and Arwad</span>
3 0
3 years ago
In which model is there a balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government?
saul85 [17]
If you can provide a picture, I will reply to this comment with an answer.
6 0
3 years ago
Which statement from holes is an opinion?
nirvana33 [79]
The one that says As Stanley entered the wreck
room,
6 0
3 years ago
Is a secular outlook on the world an essentially modern phenomenon, or does it have precedents in the second-wave era?
Pepsi [2]
It seems like we have a number of precedents in the past as well. <span>For example Confucianism is a popular philosophy found in Chinese culture, looking at the teachings given by the Confucius it seems it had more of a practical and worldly approach than religious, the reason why Chinese elite were struck by the phenomenon. Another example is of Greek rationalism from where even the modern Western philosophy and secular thoughts seem to emerge. According to this religion had its own dominion separating scientific and philosophical issues. Similarly, legalism can be another example.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which form of government did the soviet Union impose on eastern europe
    13·2 answers
  • Explain the criteria that presidents typically apply when selecting a supreme Court nominee.
    8·1 answer
  • How did Southerners react to slave revolts?
    9·2 answers
  • Which country had an uprising the alliance had to suppress?
    10·2 answers
  • When were the America hostages in Iran released
    9·1 answer
  • How would you describe Wu Di’s attitude about China’s relationship with the rest of the world?
    6·2 answers
  • How many presidents are there in the world?
    11·2 answers
  • John says WW1 made the goverment much more powerful, give three examples of this:​
    11·1 answer
  • What were some things that people hated about Russia?​
    11·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE IM CONFUSED!!!!!
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!