Answer:
a
The estimate is 
b
Method B this is because the faulty breaks are less
Step-by-step explanation:
The number of microchips broken in method A is 
The number of faulty breaks of method A is 
The number of microchips broken in method B is 
The number of faulty breaks of method A is 
The proportion of the faulty breaks to the total breaks in method A is


The proportion of the faulty to the total breaks in method B is

For this estimation the standard error is

substituting values


The z-values of confidence coefficient of 0.95 from the z-table is

The difference between proportions of improperly broken microchips for the two breaking methods is mathematically represented as
![K = [p_1 - p_2 ] \pm z_{0.95} * SE](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K%20%3D%20%5Bp_1%20-%20p_2%20%5D%20%5Cpm%20z_%7B0.95%7D%20%2A%20SE)
substituting values
![K = [0.08 - 0.07 ] \pm 1.96 *0.0186](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K%20%3D%20%5B0.08%20-%200.07%20%5D%20%5Cpm%201.96%20%2A0.0186)

The interval of the difference between proportions of improperly broken microchips for the two breaking methods is

Answer:
n=601
Step-by-step explanation:
A confidence interval is "a range of values that’s likely to include a population value with a certain degree of confidence. It is often expressed a % whereby a population means lies between an upper and lower interval".
The margin of error is the range of values below and above the sample statistic in a confidence interval.
Normal distribution, is a "probability distribution that is symmetric about the mean, showing that data near the mean are more frequent in occurrence than data far from the mean".
The population proportion have the following distribution
In order to find the critical value we need to take in count that we are finding the interval for a proportion, so on this case we need to use the z distribution. Since our interval is at 95% of confidence, our significance level would be given by
and
. And the critical value would be given by:
The confidence interval for the mean is given by the following formula:
The margin of error for the proportion interval is given by this formula:
(a)
And on this case we have that
and we are interested in order to find the value of n, if we solve n from equation (a) we got:
(b)
Since we don't have a prior estimation for the proportion we can use 0.5 as estimation. And replacing into equation (b) the values from part a we got:
And rounded up we have that n=601
Answer:
No, it does not represent a proportional relationship.
Step-by-step explanation:
The ratios do not reduce to the same value.
40/1 = 40
50/2 = 25
60/3 = 20
We can also tell straight away that this is not a proportional relationship because Nina starts with $30. If the data were graphed, this would mean that the line would not go through the origin. It would start at 30 on the y axis.
Subtract 3 from y you get 6(-y)
6*y=6y
P(x)=-4(x-15)2+2
P(x)=7
P(7)=-4(7-15)2+2
-4*7-4*-15
P(7)=-28+60+2+2
P(7)=92