1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SCORPION-xisa [38]
2 years ago
5

1.) What changes did the Mexican Constitution of 1917 enact? 2.) What were the main effects of the Mexican Revolution? 3.) What

were the results of increased prosperity in Latin America? 4.) What were the causes and effects of political and economic changes in Latin America in the late 1800s and early 1900s? PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!!1
History
1 answer:
sladkih [1.3K]2 years ago
8 0
1. The 1917 Mexican Constitution embodied all the aspirations and needs of the Mexican people. It explicitly tells that land is owned by the nation, added the right to form professional organizations. The constitution also contained land and agrarian reforms.
2. The main effects of Mexican revolution are the drive of nationalism to every Mexican people so they can aspire for their own country and have their rights as citizens of the nation.

3. The increased prosperity of Latin America helped improved both the agrarian and industrial sectors which are both essential to attain national progress.

<span>4. The political and economic transition of Latin America was not easy. </span>
<span>Internal conflicts among the leaders roused inside their country. It took a while for them to have a national plan to run the country.</span>
You might be interested in
Although most of Africa practiced islam, etheopia had its own for of Christianity known as what Christianity
skelet666 [1.2K]

I think it might be ethiopian orthodoxy , pentay , and catholic.

3 0
3 years ago
4 points 3. The quotation, from an eyewitness on the Trail of Tears, describes events connected with the "The Cherokees are near
weeeeeb [17]
The answer is 12 I think, I do you mean 4x3?
4 0
3 years ago
what are the chief steps leading to the definition of history given in the paragraph beginning “This line of reasoning...” Why n
MAVERICK [17]

A definition of history in a dictionary would say something along the lines of:

History:

1. The branch of knowledge dealing with past events.

2. A continuous, systematic telling of past events.

<em>(Wordreference) </em>

If, when defining history, we were to only look up a definition in a dictionary, we would have a simplistic view of what this branch of study does. History is definitely concerned with telling past events. However, this information is often incomplete, contradictory, too abundant, too unclear or inexistent. Even when information is readily available, the source of information can never be perfect because of problems that are inherent in recording events, such as perspective, or bias.

The task of historians, then, is to try to be as precise as possible without adding information they cannot be sure about. They also have to draw their own conclusions when there is not enough definite evidence. This is what the paragraph refers to as an argument, because of the interplay of evidence and conclusion.

Therefore, because of all the inherent problems in interpretation, the thing that historians can control the most is the method, or the “way of reading and writing about events of the past.” If, during interpretation, historians make use of a systematic, professional set of rules to interpret, they can be more confident in their conclusions. This set of rules is what people have to master if they desire to become historians.


3 0
3 years ago
The Dawes Severalty Act of 1887 was mostly intended to
german

Answer:

provide a vast program of Christianization, education, and United States citizenship

5 0
2 years ago
when a person is charged with a federal crime which level of the judicial system will he or she most likely encounter first
Firlakuza [10]

Titles of people involved – State cases are brought by prosecutors or district attorneys; federal cases are brought by United States Attorneys. State court trial judges have a range of titles, but federal judges are called district court judges.

Federal magistrate judges are used in federal cases to hear initial matters (such as pre-trial motions), but they do not usually decide cases.

The use of grand juries to charge defendants is not required by all states, but it is a requirement in federal felony cases unless the defendant waives the grand jury indictment.

States and the federal government have laws making certain acts illegal, and each jurisdiction is responsible for setting punishments for committing those crimes. A state may punish a certain crime more harshly than the federal government (or vice versa), but a defendant can be charged and convicted under both systems.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who was John Marshall?
    8·2 answers
  • The right to petition the government for redress of grievances dates back to the​
    8·1 answer
  • What were the major movements and goals of antebellum reform?
    13·2 answers
  • How did Madison think the necessary separation of powers among the three branches should be achieved ?
    13·1 answer
  • Describe ways Texas and its citizens contributed to the Allied war effort during World War II
    14·2 answers
  • Choose all that apply. Zoroastrianism practices the threefold path of _____. good thoughts good deeds good food good behavior go
    5·2 answers
  • Three hundred Spartans made a famous stand against the Persian army in the name of freedom at _____.
    7·1 answer
  • How did the life of colonial children affect children today​
    7·2 answers
  • Which technology led to a diffusion of culture from Europe to Latin America in the late 1400’s and 1500’s?
    12·1 answer
  • Bill of Rights Drop and Drag WS
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!