In a situation wherein Country Y has a progressive tax system for income, with no credits or deductions, a CEO earning $2.5 million per year would pay the most as a percentage of income in the country Y. Therefore, the option D holds true.
<h3>What is the significance of a progressive tax system?</h3>
A progressive tax system can be referred to or considered as a system wherein the percentage of tax to be levied increases with an increase in the total taxable income for an individual. The rates of taxation under this system are defined under percentage.
In the situation given above, when a CEO in country Y earns $2.5 million, i.e., more than any other person mentioned above, he will be the one who will have to pay the most taxes as a part of percentage of his income.
Therefore, the option D holds true and states regarding the significance of the progressive tax system.
Learn more about progressive tax system here:
brainly.com/question/12416177
#SPJ2
Answer:
The correct answer is C.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Cash inflows:
Year 1= $11,000
Year 2= $24,000
Year 3= $36,000
To calculate the present value, we need to use the following formula:
FV= PV*(1+i)^n
Isolating PV:
PV= FV/(1+i)^n
Year 1= 11,000/(1.12)= $9,821.43
Year 2= 24,000/(1.12^2)= $19,132.65
Year 3= 36,000/(1.12^3)= $25,624.09
Total= $54,578.17
Answer:
The correct answer is Interpersonal.
Explanation:
Interpersonal justice refers to the perception of justice of employees in the interpersonal treatment they receive from those who have the power and the power to distribute the results (usually managers and managers). It is important for managers to be courteous and polite and treat employees with dignity and respect to promote interpersonal justice. In addition, managers and managers must refrain from making derogatory comments or belittling their subordinates.
I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is the third option. Explicit costs are easily identified because a recent market transaction is available to provide an accurate measure of costs. It <span>is a direct payment made to others in the course of running a business, such as wage, rent and materials.</span>
Answer:
the answer for the first question is $166667.
the answer for the second question is $210526
the answer for the third question is An inverse.
Explanation:
given information that i will invest in a $10000 scholarship that will pay forever.
the interest rate charged is 6.00% per annum therefore this is a perpetuity present value problem where there is streams of income forever therefore we use the formula :
Pv of perpetuity= Cf/r
where Cr is the cash flows payed by the single investment forever in this case $10000 then r is the interest rate of the investment amount which is 6% in this case.
Pv of Perpetuity= $10000/6%
=$166667 therefore i must invest this amount to get the scholarship running with streams of $10000 forever.
in the second problem if now the interest rate is changed from 6% to 4.75% then the amount to be invested would be :
Pv of perpetuity = $10000/4.75%
=$210526 therefore this is the amount to be invested for a forever $10000 stream of incomes for a scholarship.
the relationship is indirect cause as the interest rate decreases the present value of the perpetuity that must be invested increases.