It is false because it has changed over the years.
Answer:
I believe that The European Union is a good thing because in times of war, the countries most likely will not go to war against each other, and also because it allows the countries in the EU to become iron allies, which could prove useful in both war and times of hardship. Speaking of hardship, if any of the countries in the EU is faced with hardship or a hard decision, that country can ask the other countries in the European Union for help or for advice. And, if anybody in one of the nations within the EU travels to another country that is in the EU can use the same form of money, without the worry of having to convert it to the type of money that is used there, because every country in the European Union uses the same type of currency, the euro. For instance, if someone in, say, France, travels to maybe Greece for vacation, then that person could use the same form of money in Greece as used in France, which is a big worry taken off the mind. Plus, it gives the countries reasons why not to go to war over each other, and so they countries probably won't go to war against each other for a small reason, such as a steel mine or the sort. The European Union lets the citizens of the countries in the EU have freedom and human dignity, which is more than most countries have to offer to their citizens. The EU is a surprisingly good method of maintaining peace in the European countries, or, at least for the ones in the EU, such as Belgium, Germany, Greece, or Italy. So, in conclusion, I believe that the European Union is a good thing, for many reasons.
Explanation:
<h2><u><em>
Brainlest Please!</em></u></h2>
Answer:
The activities of multinational corporations.
Explanation:
Multinational companies are those economic corporations that offer goods or services in more than one country, thus grabbing large market shares at the international level.
These companies generally have large sums of capital to invest, with which they tend to exert an enormous influence on nations with fewer economic resources. Thus, when investing in underdeveloped countries, these countries give up more than a market share, but also on many occasions their own power to exercise their sovereignty, mainly in relation to their natural resources and the administration of their territory.
It is in Asia .
Near Indian ocean.
First, there were two independent clinical psychologists who were present or on call 24 hours a day. They had the power to intervene and to remove anyone from the study if they thought they were in distress.
Second, we had paramedics and security guards on hand and ready to intervene at a moment’s notice if anything untoward happened in the study.
Third, the study was constantly monitored by members of a five-person independent ethics panel. This was chaired by a Member of Parliament and also included members of the Holocaust Educational Trust, the Howard League for Penal Reform, the BBC’s Independent Editorial Policy Unit and a senior academic psychologist. This committee had the power to change the way the study as a whole was run and to terminate it if they had ethical concerns.
http://www.bbcprisonstudy.org/bbc-prison-study.php?p=27
