If the government should impose the per unit tax, the parts that would be affected are the average variable cost and the average cost
<h3>What is the per Unit tax?</h3>
This is the tax that is imposed per unit or on each unit of a good that has being sold or a service that has been rendered.
This is the type of tax that would affect the average variable cost and the average cost.
This type of tax is one that is proportional to the unit of the good sold. This is in terms of the quantity sold and not the price that was used to sell the good.
Read more on tax here:
brainly.com/question/25783927
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer is GDP would definitely increase because GDP excludes leisure.
Explanation:
The GDP does not measure the level of development of a country, nor does it measure the quality or level of its educational system or its health. Come on, that the quality of life in general is not measurable by GDP, although it is true that countries with a higher GDP per capita can afford better health or education services, as well as better infrastructure and services in general.
It does not measure the state of the environment or the damage caused to it or natural resources by the economic activity carried out. In other words, GDP does not report externalities, that is, it does not reflect the total social benefits and costs derived from economic activity.
GDP does not measure the quality of the goods and services produced. The GDP figures are only numbers that do not take into account exactly what is being produced or what is the quality of what is produced. This prevents, for example, comparing production between different eras. Does a computer add up to GDP now than in the 80s? The answer is no. Does a country of services add up to an oil exporter? The answer is also no.
It ignores the value of elements that contribute to maintaining the level of well-being of the population, such as leisure or freedom. In freer countries or in which its inhabitants have more leisure time and better options in which to invest it, well-being is much greater.
The given statement exists true.
The diameter of the efferent arterioles in the glomerulus decreased while
- Net filtration pressure will decrease.
- The glomerular filtration rate will decrease.
- Urine output will decrease.
- Systemic blood pressure will decrease.
<h3>What would happen if the diameter of the efferent arterioles in the glomerulus decreased?</h3>
- The net pressure of filtration will drop.
- The rate of glomerular filtration will slow down.
- Urine production will drop.
- The level of systemic blood pressure will drop.
The approaching (afferent) arteriole has a larger diameter than the outgoing (efferent) arteriole (by which blood leaves the glomerulus). The difference in diameter between the entering and leaving arterioles causes the blood pressure inside the glomerulus to rise.
The blood components are forced out of the glomerular capillaries by elevated blood pressure. Glomerular filtration is hindered and slows down if the diameter of the efferent arteriole exceeds that of the afferent arteriole. Without the real pressure gradient, it is also impossible to filter out all the components.
To learn more about efferent arterioles refer to:
brainly.com/question/15738991
#SPJ4
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
Given the information above, first we need to compute ending balance of account receivables.
Ending balance of account receivables = Beginning balance + Credit sales - Customer's account collected - Write off amount
= $125,000 + $1,400,000 - $1,350,000 - $0
= $175,000
The year end balance in the allowance for uncollectible account would be
= $175,000 × 10%
= $17,500
Now, the bad debt expense
= Year end balance of allowance for uncollectible account - Beginning balance of allowance for doubtful accounts + Written off
= $17,500 - $15,000 + $0
= $2,500
Answer:
It cost $915,166.69
Explanation:
R=75,000
i=j/m, j=0.0525, m=1 - annually
i=0.0525
n=mt
n=20
An=R[1-(1+i)^-n] : i
An=(75,000x[1-(1+0.0525)^-20]) : 0.0525
An=$ 915,166.69
