Answer:
I <em>THINK</em> the answer is C, but I would try waiting for some other responses, if this question is very important.
Explanation:
The overall message in the conclusion seems to be would help students learn more.
Why I don't think option A is it:
"which is way better for students because they would not be as rushed."
To me, this is the second best. A rushed student could obviously hurt the learning, but it doesn't go out and directly state it. If the underlying goal is to prove that it's better because they will learn better, this doesn't necessarily push that agenda.
Why I don't think option B is it:
"class material could be covered at a more even and logical pace."
Although everyone loves even and logical paces, this doesn't go out and say <em>better learning</em> either. Who knows, maybe we learn best during unlogical and uneven pacing.
Why I don't think option D is it:
"this is clearly a much better option for both students and teachers"
Basically the same thing I've said 2 times, it doesn't push the agenda that it will improve learning.
Best of luck, I hate the year-round topic. It is annoying, overused and uninteresting.
