Answer:
a letter written by a person who is describing a current event
Explanation:
A primary source is a document from the time period of the event.
While most of these could be considered one, you have to do a process of elimination.
A scholarly article about an old event isn't a primary source, so it's not that.
An interview with a reporter who wrote about a current event is not a primary source because it is not the original document from the reporter.
A student's report about an event that occurred during her lifetime is a primary source, but it is not the best example.
Group of answer choices a small group of individuals exercises power but remains constitutionally responsible to the public non-democratic.
a small group of individuals exercises power over the state without being constitutionally responsible to the public
- This section first explains why a more thorough typology is required rather than a simple binary classification before outlining various nondemocratic regime types. Although it does not attempt to assess the relative efficacy of each type of regime discussed—doing so would necessitate a book unto itself—it does conclude with a sobering reminder of the numerous atrocities done by nondemocratic regimes that should never be overlooked.
- The goal of legitimization is to win the populace's active permission, compliance with the regime's regulations, passive obedience, toleration, or resignation. Legitimation presents at least two significant obstacles for the study of non-democratic regimes. The first criticism is that legitimation is only "window decoration." Accordingly, the autocracies' attempts to legitimize themselves lack substance since they are merely outward manifestations of the violence, coercion, or co-optation the regime is able to wield. Second, it is frequently asserted that the conceptual and methodological challenges involved in its analysis are insurmountable, even though it is widely acknowledged that legitimation is crucial to the continuation of non-democratic government. Understanding the goals, motivations, and consequences of non-democratic regimes makes these obstacles crucial to overcome Having stable legitimacy can shed light on several facets of autocratic rule.
To learn more about nondemocratic visit:brainly.com/question/474018
#SPJ4
Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
It is a direct approach to conflict.
Martha thinks it is better to get angry rather than hide or suppress her feelings, so that her husband knows she really cares about the issue.
What makes option A the best answer, is because she does not want to hide the details from the issue, she prefers to let it out of the bag than keeping it in and it keeps burning until the un-usual happens which is not always the best method to resolve conflicts.
It is direct because she believes its better her husband knows she is angry and then settle the matter than allowing the issue to keep burning inside of her. it is direct because the matter made her angry and she is expressing it other than neglecting it.
Bsmakisiw maksiishwjnwnw nsiisuwbmw
