1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
serious [3.7K]
3 years ago
9

Which amendment was introduced to prevent anyone from assuming that the rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights are the only pro

tected rights? A. Ninth B. Tenth C. Eighth D. Fourth
History
2 answers:
Maksim231197 [3]3 years ago
6 0
A. Ninth
The Ninth Amendment was introduced to prevent anyone from assuming that the rights enumerated in the bill of rights were the only protected rights by the Constitution.
saw5 [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A. Ninth

Explanation:

The ninth amendment says:

<em>"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."</em>

It was proposed by the congress in 1789 and James Madison proposed it in order to make sure that people wouldn´t take the constitution literally and gave people only the rights ennumerated in the bill of rights and make it clear that people had other rights that are just as important as those cited in the Bill of Rights and that those given right should be respected.

You might be interested in
What was a Southern advantage during the Civil War?
tigry1 [53]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

The South mainly won due to to leadership. They had much better generals and leaders such as Robert E. Lee. Otherwise, the Union would have won much faster.

3 0
2 years ago
What significance does the Holocaust have to current world events?
Bingel [31]

Answer:

One of the perks of being an educator at Holocaust Museum Houston is that thousands of students are touched by the work that we do, and the lessons we teach, each year. One of the downsides is that we only have a short time, with large groups of students, to convey the fundamental importance of this history, and make sure that every student in the room is impacted by what they have learned.  

Unfortunately, perhaps, we do hear all too often from students—as I am sure most history teachers do, that the Holocaust was a long time ago, and it doesn’t matter anymore. Or we hear, “I am not Jewish, so this does matter to me.” And we even have some young people say to us, “This is not my history or my people’s history, so I don’t care.” How wrong they are. History is important because of the roots that it created in societies all over the world. History shows us the paths to new languages, new geographical discoveries, and amendments to government. History also shares with us deeply important lessons that need to be heard and remembered by every single living person.  

The lessons of the Holocaust can be applied universally. This is not just a conversation about the history of the Jewish people, or the history of the Roma people in Germany during World War II. This is not even necessarily a story about World War II. The Holocaust is a deeply personal story about the effect that hatred and prejudice can have on a community. It is a story about millions of people who refused to use their voice to help others, and because of that refusal, millions of people lost their lives for no other reason than the belief that they were an inferior people. Are there any other historical events where we see hatred and prejudice impact communities? Are there current events in the world that share the experience of an apathetic population of people, determined to not get involved? Determined to remain “neutral?” Elie Wiesel once said, “We must take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim.”

One of the key experiences shared by victims of the Holocaust, as well as other genocides and acts of hatred, is the perpetrator’s ability to dehumanize them. Dehumanization is the removal of human dignity, human rights, humanity in its entirety. Dehumanization is key to getting ordinary people to commit acts of violence and mass murder against their community members. This lesson is not exclusive to the Holocaust. Dehumanization, facilitated by the Nuremberg and Berlin Laws, in the Holocaust are just acts of legalized discrimination. In Rwanda, the Hutus called the Tutsis cockroaches and used the media to spread hate speech inspiring violent acts by the community. In Cambodia, people had their autonomy removed by the Khmer Rouge and were placed into a completely new society based on their designated trustworthiness. People being assigned uniforms, numbers, having their heads shaved, and not being allowed to speak their native languages, practice their cultural traditions, or honor their religious beliefs all play into dehumanization. We see dehumanization everywhere.  

The Holocaust matters to us because it is one of the most, if not the most, extensively documented instance of atrocity, hatred, dehumanization, and apathy in world history. The Holocaust also matters because as it was happening, the world stood by and watched—not just Germans, not just Europeans—the world. Today, we use the Holocaust to remember that we, as world citizens, can and must do better.

Explanation:

    im  a nerd with this stuff.  

8 0
2 years ago
Pathogens can enter the body through a wound. A.True B.False
salantis [7]
Pathogens can enter the body through a wound. A, true, would be the right answer. 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP ASAP I'M BEING TIMED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
lubasha [3.4K]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

The Allies were powerful, but it is arguable that at the beginning of the war their military technology could not compete with Germany and Japan. This is why Germany and Japan were able to invade so many countries. Towards the end of the World War II, the Allies began to get the upper hand because they had access to resources that the Axis didn't.

3 0
2 years ago
Which statement about the Supreme Court is true?
Sergio039 [100]

<u>Answer:</u>

E. The court can hear only cases that have worked their way up from local courts.

This statement about the Supreme Court is true.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Clients or entities who are not happy with the jurisdiction and result of the lower courts can apply the request or petition at the U.S Supreme Court to hear their case. One can ask for the review of the case by asking it to grant a "writ of certiorari".

This means the lower court where the case was initially filed has to send a copy to the Supreme court for review. It generally never hears cases as such until the case is of national significance or the result of a case might harmonize a conflicting decision to settle or when it might have precedential value.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Luther did not go to rome when he was summoned by the pope because
    11·1 answer
  • Who controlled the indian ocean trade routes?
    6·1 answer
  • Ben lives near a busy street frequented by vehicles what is Ben susceptible situation
    11·2 answers
  • Which action by the President is NOT a check on the power of the legislative branch?
    7·1 answer
  • Mark allan powell advance three possible reason for paul letters to the Romans
    15·1 answer
  • Were conditions in the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory usual for factories at the time?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of these describes the main goal of Lyndon b Johnson great society program
    6·1 answer
  • How were the reasons for empire growth and decline similar and different in various
    7·1 answer
  • Define-District Primary.
    12·1 answer
  • Why were certain foods rationed during world war 2
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!