Answer:
What arguments could be made for removing the dictator?
Arguments for removing the dictator are: allowing the country to establish a democracy. Helping out or improving the situation of those demographic groups that were oppressed by the dictator. Another argument is simply punishing the dictator for his crimes.
What arguments could be made for keeping the dictator in power?
The main argument for keeping the dictator is to ensure the stability of the country, even if such stability is unfair at many times, and comes along with the oppresion of certain social and political groups.
Another argument is simply to prevent the country from getting worse.
A final argument is pragmatic: keeping the dictator in power might serve everyone's interests better. Democratic countries have frequently established ties with authoritarian governments.
Answer:
It's B. They were fighting to keep their land. :)
Explanation:
Pontiac's Rebellion begins when a confederacy of Native American warriors under Ottawa chief Pontiac attacks the British force. In that native Americans are joined to the Pontiac's rebellion.
I’m pretty sure it’s false I had a test on it and I’m pretty sure I’m right
The correct answer is The federal government maintained some power over Native American land.
The Dawes Act was a piece of legislation passed in the late 19th century. The goal of this law was to distribute some land to Native Americans in hope that they would assimilate into American society.
The excerpt above focuses on ownership of the land. It is evident that the federal government still has control over the land. This is based on the idea that the federal government can take the land back from the Native Americans in certain circumstances. All the government has to do is pay the individuals for their land.
