1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
goblinko [34]
3 years ago
11

As new discoveries and economic opportunities became available in the Renaissance, the kings and queens of Europe began to inves

t in chartered companies. Why were monarchs willing to invest in these sometimes risky business ventures?
a.The monarch could control the company's every decision from afar, adding to their power.
b.The monarch could expand his or her territory into new lands without the cost or risk required to set up a colony.
c.The costs of funding and defending a charter were low and therefore worth the risk and capital involved.
d.Most monarchs believed that the companies could serve as their eyes and ears abroad--as spies.
History
1 answer:
ankoles [38]3 years ago
5 0

b.The monarch could expand his or her territory into new lands without the cost or risk required to set up a colony.

Charters were business ventures and the cost and maintenance of the settlement is up to the business.

Monarchs investing in a charter allowed them to expand their empire and bring wealth into the country with little investment. The monarch acted as an investor while the company set up a means of making money. If the settlement failed was successful, the monarchy would profit but if it failed the money lost was felt most by the company.

You might be interested in
Hiiiiiii helppp me in this especially number 3 .Rewrite it to make it true if false and if true just write true.
kiruha [24]
The correct answer for 1 is false. After the French defeat, the lands became British and Britain imposed new rules on how to deal with Natives. These rules were not friendly and the Native Americans were highly dissatisfied because the French were often friendly to the Natives and worked together with them

The correct answer for 2 is true. The land where the Natives lived belonged to France. Frenchmen didn't bother them and kept the relations positive. When France lost and Britain got the  territories, British soldiers inhabited the land and started bothering the locals which rose tensions.

The correct answer for 3 is false. The Native American tribes that worked together failed to kick out the British armies from the lands. However, they did compel them to change their policies regarding trade and behavior on the lands which means that it was a sort of a stale mate.

The correct answer for 4 is true. The proclamation forbade the colonists from going westwards. This caused a lot of anger because they wanted to spread more westwards since they wanted more land for themselves. This proclamation was important because it established borders for living in the colonies.

The correct answer for 5 is false. The colonists were unhappy. They wanted to go more westwards and get new land and establish new colonies. They believed that the king had no right to restrict their movement since it was forbidden by law to go westwards.
3 0
3 years ago
What is one SPECIFIC example of a primary source?
Alenkinab [10]
Archives and manuscript material. photographs, audio recordings, video recordings, films. journals, letters and diaries.
3 0
3 years ago
Question refers to the excerpt below.
zepelin [54]

Answer:

Federalism cuz America baby

8 0
3 years ago
What foreign-policy move did the United States make in exchange for greater trade access to Japan?
miskamm [114]

Answer:

Option B: It withdrew from Open Door agreements with China.

Explanation:

The Open Door policy was a statement of principles initiated by the United States in 1899 and 1900. It called for protection of equal privileges for all countries trading with China and for the support of Chinese territorial and administrative integrity.

3 0
1 year ago
How has modern Ethiopian culture been influenced by Axum?
Svetradugi [14.3K]

Answer:

Rulers of Ethiopia still go by the title of pharaoh.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What effect did the mongol invasion have on kiev
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following weapons finally broke the statement on the western
    10·1 answer
  • Small kingdoms on the Iberian Peninsula fought to take land back from the Moors during which event?
    12·1 answer
  • How did advancements in technology differentiate World War II from World<br> War I?
    5·1 answer
  • Select the two houses of England's Parliament. Senate House of Lords House of Commons House of Representatives Knesset
    9·2 answers
  • What would be the BEST title for this list of people?
    11·1 answer
  • Why was the Battle of Saratoga important to the American Revolution?
    9·1 answer
  • Answer all and get the points
    10·1 answer
  • How did American corporate interests influence U.S. imperialism over the turn of the twentieth century?
    11·1 answer
  • Has the U.S. always had the same borders? In other words, has the “line” that separates the U.S.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!