Answer:
see there are many stories you are asking which one please explain briefly
Answer:
<h3>1c 2g 3a 4i 5j</h3><h3>6h7b 8f 9d 10e</h3><h3>hope it helps</h3><h3>I would be very happy if u mark it as brainliest...</h3>
There was nothing in the house to demand care, to claim attention, to cumber my consciousness with it's insistent, unchanging companionship.
<u>Explanation:</u>
This line in the passage shows that the things in the house are a burden. There was nothing in the house that could give care or attention to the people and were all materialistic things.
All this tells us that the things were not to be with the people and were all materialistic. They could not give companionship, love and care to the people and were only considered as a burden.
Answer:
Locke argued that perhaps the life, freedom or assets of no one would have been protected in a natural state and there will be no state or rules to protect them. That's why citizens have chosen to form governments.
Explanation:
Locke claims that an individual must use the authority to crush in the natural state to protect his culture, which is humanity as a whole. However, the right to prosecute is to be exercised for the advantage of his own individual culture since states are created.
Answer:
In 1946 a house wa built by them
Explanation:
