Reaganomics is the economic philosophy of Ronald Reagan that called for less federal government involvement in the economy and less regulation of businesses and corporations. This philosophy was also based around lowering the tax rate and the idea of supply side economics.
Supply side economics focused on the trickle down theory. This idea was that if corporations received tax breaks, they would use this money to hire/pay their workers. In turn, these workers would be able to spend money on goods within the economy. This would keep the economy going strong.
Congress supported these ideas by lowering the federal tax rate and putting less restrictions on businesses and corporations.
Answer:
i dont understand what ur asking me to do can u make a picture please
Explanation:
The correct answer to this question is:The Constitution guarantees that the government will not favor one
religion over another.
one of the reformation effect was the founding of several protestant churches such as Calvinism,Lutheranism and Huguenots. The cost of this was several religious civil wars in countries as the catholic faced off with the protestants and vice versa. several countries in Europe thus advocated one church over the other. The USA constitutional system established the freedoms of worship, and that the government will not favor one religion over the other.
<span />
The terms Tatars or Tartars are applied to nomadic Mongolic peoples who, themselves, were conquered by Mongols and incorporated into their horde. They were mainly composed of Kipchaks-Cuman people.
On October 28 [1480], Ivan gradually started to pull his armies back to Kremenets for winter quarters. Akhmat waited for reinforcements until November 11 and then turned south. Among other reasons for Akhmat's retreat was the possible threat of Crimean, Nogai or other attacks on his unprotected home base, a common problem in nomadic warfare. As Nikolai Karamzin wrote in his "History of Russian State", "It should have been an odd image: two armies ran away from each other, not pursued by anyone".
The Mongolian yoke over Russia was underpinned by their ability to compel obedience (i.e. tribute) through the force of arms. Akhmat Khan's retreat destroyed the credibility of this threat. Regardless of the actual circumstances, the fact that the Russians defied him and successfully withstood his retaliation, demonstrated the Horde no longer had the military strength to keep Russia subjugated.
So technically, the retreat wasn't the end of the yoke; that happened a few years earlier, when Ivan III stopped making tribute payments and repudiated Mongol authority. But the retreat confirmed it.
Of course, this wasn't a sudden shift. Muscovy had been gaining strength while the Horde slowly declined for over a century. As early as 1378, Dmitry ceased making regular tribute payments and fought off the Golden Horde's armies, though he submitted again in 1382. By 1480 Ivan III had consolidated most of Russia under his rule, while the Golden Horde had conversely fragmented into several successor states.
That said, 1480 does represent the last attempt by the Horde to re-assert its dominance over Russia. Accordingly, its dramatic failure is traditionally held to be the definitive end to the Tartar-Mongol yoke. Akhmat Khan's own death soon afterwards, as well as the Great Horde's destruction, sealed the deal.
