Answer:This revolution is what established the government form of communism in Russia, which the United States was directly opposed to. As a result of the revolution, Russia signed the treaty of Bretsk-Litovsk with the Germany, allowing them to leave the war.Mar 7, 2017
Explanation:
The Egyptians failed to adapt to the new changes of their world. There are multiple books on this and it is very interesting.
The inference shows that Rosa Parks's purpose in telling her story is B. To provide information.
<h3>Who is Rosa Park?</h3>
It should be noted that Rosa Park was simply an American activist that was vital in the role played in Montgomery boycott.
In this case, inference shows that Rosa Parks's purpose in telling her story is to provide information about what happened.
Learn more about Rosa Park on:
brainly.com/question/511251
Answer:
Athenian Society
Explanation:
Athenian Society is characterized by their mode of governance being Democracy, which vested the matters concerning the state on the general citizens and the upper class together. It is often referred to as Assembly of the People. This Pericles's Funeral Oration was delivered in a public funeral in honor of all those who had laid their lives in the war. It is culturally delivered by a well-known-Athenian citizen.
Hence, in this case, the early society that is described in this excerpt widely known as ATHENIAN SOCIETY
Answer:
He would not be happy due to the fact that he wanted all the 3 powers to be separated from one other. His reason for being unhappy will be because he felt the separation of the powers couldn't be possible with the system in the question stated where there is 1 representative for 2 powers.
Explanation:
He would not be happy due to the fact that he wanted all the 3 powers to be separated from one other. His reason for being unhappy will be because he felt the separation of the powers couldn't be possible with the system in the question stated where there is 1 representative for 2 powers.
The major reasoning behind his thinking is that if one person were allowed to serve in both house of reps and Supreme court, they would likely influence the others in both branches to take side with them which could lead to forming a strong force with two of the branches, which will in turn lead to a great threat to the system.
