1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gregori [183]
3 years ago
14

Why did James I quarrel with Parliament?

History
1 answer:
IRISSAK [1]3 years ago
8 0

James I quarreled with Parliament because he believed in the divine right of kings, particularly that he should be all-powerful, while Parliament was more democratic and wanted more power to the people.

You might be interested in
What was the result of Harpers ferry in 2859
lisov135 [29]
Harpers Ferry (1859) was one of the major events that led to the American Civil War.
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did fertility and mortality rates affect populations during industrialization?
uranmaximum [27]
Economists have frequently hypothesized that industrialization and its correlates played a major role in inducing fertility decline in the United States after 1850. ... This leaves changes in the cost of raising children as the likely driver of the industrialization result.
8 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Evgen [1.6K]

Answer:

whats ur question???

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is an example of yellow journalism? A. Articles that dealt with facts about the Spanish American war B. A
Snowcat [4.5K]
The answer you are looking for is D.) articles that exaggerated or manipulated events to shock readers.

For example lets say there was a car crash and the people had minor injuries in your town.  Later you see on the morning paper that the people suffered terribly from the crash that they had to be flown to a hospital.  That is yellow journalism because the event is exaggerated.
3 0
4 years ago
This Supreme Court ruling stated slaves did not have a right to sue since they were not citizens, but merely property.
Alexxx [7]

Answer:

"Dred Scott Decision," which was very controversial.

Explanation:

DRED SCOTT DECISION where the Supreme Court ruling stated slaves did not have a right to sue since they were not citizens, but merely property.

These were their arguments.

Dred Scott:

When a person enters a free State or territory, the free status overrides the previous condition of servitude. Since slavery was forbidden in the free States and territories by

federal and State laws, Dred Scott became free when he entered Illinois and Wisconsin.

Sandford:

To deprive a person of property (in this case, Dred Scott) without due process or just compensation violated the 5th Amendment, which states that “No person shall be… deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” Dred Scott was still a slave and no master's property rights could be limited or taken away by a State or federal law.

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What Style of vase had a black background?
    7·2 answers
  • Why was a plan for reconstruction of the south needed?
    13·2 answers
  • The bolsheviks under lenin sought to rally the russian people for the revolution under the slogan:
    10·1 answer
  • What place did textiles hold in Incan culture?
    8·2 answers
  • How did ideas of the Enlightenment lead to the independence and founding of the USA
    5·1 answer
  • The Islamic requirements to learn Arabic
    6·1 answer
  • Why did kennedy have trouble getting his legislative proposals passed by congress?
    13·1 answer
  • The greatest benefit brought about by European colonization and trade in the Indian Ocean region was
    9·1 answer
  • How did entrepreneurs try to control competition?
    6·1 answer
  • Pls help i need this by the end of the day
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!