1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Blizzard [7]
3 years ago
5

What us supreme court decision set forth objective standards for questioning by police after a defendant has been taken into cus

tody?
Social Studies
2 answers:
-Dominant- [34]3 years ago
6 0
<span>Miranda v. Arizona. The decision lead to the creation of what are commonly known as your "Miranda Rights", namely that before being questioned criminal suspects be advised of their rights to representation, and against self-incrimination.</span>
andrew11 [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The Miranda v. Arizona decision taken by the United States Supreme Court in 1966 mandates that no defendant in police custody can make inculpatory or exculpatory statements admissible at trial if the defendant has not being informed of his or her right to legal counsel before and while being interrogated and his or her right against self-incrimination.  

The name was taken from the particular case where the citizen, Ernesto Miranda, was charged with two crimes and signed a confession admitting to them; however, Miranda was at no point informed of his right to legal counsel and that his statements could be used against him. The case escalated to the Supreme Court with the consequences in jurisprudence so familiar to us nowadays.

You might be interested in
The media have no effect on our socialization. X True ✓ False
djverab [1.8K]

i would say false (in my opinion)

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When entering a street from an unpaved road, you should:?
pshichka [43]
Entering a unpaved road I should look both ways and walk when no cars are around
6 0
3 years ago
In many industrialized nations, strong social norms dictate efforts to behave in a cool, calm, and collected manner in public, e
yKpoI14uk [10]

Your question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:

In many industrialized nations, strong social norms dictate efforts to behave in a cool, calm, and collected manner in public, especially during emergencies. Unfortunately, this norm can promote __________________.

Select one:

a. bystander intervention.

b. reciprocal indifference.

c. pluralistic ignorance.

d. altruism.

Answer:

The correct answer is letter C. <u>pluralistic ignorance.</u>

Explanation:

In psychology, pluralistic ignorance is the misconceptual perception of the behaviors of a group. That is, you, as an individual, observe others behaving a certain way and conclude they do so for certain reasons. Even though you would like to behave differently, you conform to the group norm you have observed for the reasons you have thought of. Your interpretation, however, may be largely wrong. Pluralistic ignorance can range from harmless behaviors - such as not raising your hand when you have a question because no one else seems to have any doubts - to dangerous ones.

One dangerous behavior that has been observed by researchers is the one described in the question. A bystander fails to intervene and help during an emergency because other bystanders are not doing anything. He/She assumes that the others have assessed the situation and concluded there is nothing to worry about. Due to his or her uncertainty and fear of doing the wrong thing, the bystander chooses to conform and not help.

8 0
3 years ago
What is the correct order of events that led to increased civil rights and liberties in the United States?
34kurt
Slavery abolished, women’s suffrage guaranteed, Prohibition ends, 18 year olds guaranteed suffrage.
6 0
3 years ago
When Jessie sits down for the first day of class, the person next to him, Blake, is wearing a "Free Tibet" shirt. After a few mi
Alexus [3.1K]

Answer:

Option C

Explanation:

When Jessie sits down for the first day of class, the person next to him, Blake, is wearing a "Free Tibet" shirt. After a few minutes of talking, Jessie realizes that he likes Blake and he may unconsciously alter his attitude to agree that Tibet should be freed.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Heather considers taking a new job. She focuses on the increased opportunities for promotion and the higher salary rather than h
    14·1 answer
  • I NEED HELP! Contrast Discuss President George H.W. BushÍs foreign policy by comparing and contrasting his decisions regarding t
    6·1 answer
  • A change in allele frequencies that results when a small subgroup of a population migrates to a new area to a new are is called
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the folloing isnt true
    8·1 answer
  • Can the president be impeached for committing a crime
    5·1 answer
  • Who wrote 'Common Sense'?
    10·2 answers
  • When France, England, and other European countries declared war on Germany the United States did not. By comparing and contrasti
    14·1 answer
  • What is a major way that the media has historically represented people of color?
    11·1 answer
  • What else do you associate with the empire of Ancient Greece? They could be people, places, or things!
    10·1 answer
  • 1. The federal government is considering some fiscal policy alternatives. Will its choice between the following pairs of policy
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!