The process that would not normally be disrupted by acute labyrinthitis. a) Ossicle movement.
Labyrinthitis is the irritation of part of the inner ear referred to as the labyrinth. The eighth cranial nerve (vestibulocochlear nerve) may also be infected. The inflammation of those reasons is a feeling of spinning (vertigo), listening to loss, and other symptoms.
It takes time for labyrinthitis signs and symptoms to move away absolutely. Severe signs and symptoms commonly depart within a week. most of the people are absolutely higher within 2 to 3 months. Older adults are more likely to have dizziness that lasts longer.
The signs of labyrinthitis and vestibular neuritis can also come on unexpectedly. Signs and symptoms of the 2 conditions may be very similar. you may: have vertigo – this is the sensation that you, or things around you, are spinning even when you're still. It takes time for labyrinthitis symptoms to move away completely. Excessive symptoms typically go away inside every week. most people are absolutely higher within 2 to a few months. Older adults are much more likely to have dizziness that lasts longer.
The question is incomplete. Please read below to find the missing content.
What process would NOT normally be disrupted by acute labyrinthitis?
a) Ossicle movement
b) Head movement detection
c) Balance
d) Hearing
Learn more about labyrinthitis here brainly.com/question/802655
#SPJ1
Explanation:
The Aristotle's communication model is a speaker centered model as the speaker has the most important role in it and is the only one active. It is the speaker's role to deliver a speech to the audience. Lasswell's communication model was developed by communication theorist Harold D.
Https://www.coursehero.com/file/p5njibds/Compensation-Compensation-is-over-achievement-in-one-area-t... this website should help you with your answer
Emotional I believe is the word you are going for
The correct answer is C) because they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view.
<em>In the majority opinion, Fortas suggested that the reason the school authorities suspended the students was that they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view. </em>
We are referring to the case Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District that was decided on February 24, 1969.
In 1965, five students decided to wear black armbands in protest of the Vietnam War and they were suspended by the school for doing that. In the majority opinion, Judge Abe Fortas suggested that the reason the school authorities suspended the students was that they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view. At the end of the case, the Court decided that the use of armbands as a protest was not a motive to cause any disruption and that the protest was protected by freedom of speech.
